[Conventional and molecular diagnostics in onychomycosis-part 1 : Conventional differentiation of dermatophytes-Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton interdigitale]. / Konventionelle und molekulare Diagnostik bei Onychomykose ­ Teil 1 : Konventionelle Differenzierung von Dermatophyten ­ Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton interdigitale.

Onychomycosis is a common infectious nail disease occurring worldwide. The mycological diagnosis of onychomycosis is primarily used for differential diagnostic differentiation from other, mostly inflammatory nail diseases, such as nail psoriasis or onychodystrophies of other causes. Conventional laboratory diagnostics when onychomycosis is suspected is based on microscopic detection of fungi in the nail material using fluorescence-optical potassium hydroxide preparations and culture of the pathogen. Molecular amplification methods allow a more sensitive and specific identification of the causative dermatophyte. Here, in 108 patients with onychomycosis, the dermatophytes were identified by culture and/or molecular biology using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and the species identification was confirmed with subsequent sequencing. The dermatophytes were analyzed based on macromorphological and microscopic features. A dermatophyte was cultured in 56 of the 108 patients. Among them were 31 isolates of Trichophyton (T.) rubrum and 25 of T. interdigitale. All species identifications were subsequently confirmed by rDNA sequencing with concordant results in 54 of 56 patients. Two primarily as T. interdigitale identified specimens were revealed to be T. quinckeanum and T. tonsurans by molecular methods. T. quinckeanum, which is a zoophilic dermatophyte and a so-called emerging pathogen in dermatomycology, was isolated here for the first time as the causative agent of onychomycosis. The other dermatophyte, initially thought to be T. interdigitale, turned out to be T. tonsurans on molecular biology. This anthropophilic dermatophyte is also a rarity in onychomycosis. In addition, T. rubrum was identified by PCR in 34 of the 52 nail specimens that did not grow culture, and T. interdigitale in 18 nail specimens. However, the morphological identification of the four different dermatophytes species proved problematic. Neither the colony morphology nor the microscopic features of the dermatophytes allow clear differentiation of the pathogens. Microconidia, macroconidia, chlamydospores, and arthrospores are inconsistent in occurrence, number, microscopic distribution, and shape. The urease activity also did not allow an assignment of the dermatophyte species. These results indicate that the most sensitive detection and reliable identification of causative dermatophytes in onychomycosis is only possible by molecular methods.