Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Arthroscopic assessment for lateral collateral ligament complex deficiency of the elbow: a cadaveric study.
Kwak, Jae-Man; Kholinne, Erica; Hwang, Seung Jun; Jeon, In-Ho.
Afiliação
  • Kwak JM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, College of Medicine, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, South Korea.
  • Kholinne E; Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Trisakti, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  • Hwang SJ; Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jeon IH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, Ulsan University, 88 Olympic-Ro 43 Gil Pungnap 2(I)-Dong, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. asanshoulder@gmail.com.
Int Orthop ; 48(1): 143-150, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38091075
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To evaluate whether elbow instability due to lateral collateral ligament complex injury can be assessed reliably through arthroscopy.

METHODS:

Eight fresh human cadaveric elbows were placed in a simulated lateral decubitus position. The radiocapitellar joint (RCJ) gap and ulnohumeral joint (UHJ) gap (mm) were measured with different sizes of probes from the posterolateral viewing portal. The elbow was 90 degrees flexed with neutral forearm rotation for RCJ gap measurement and 30 degrees flexed with full supination for UHJ gap measurement. Sequential testing was performed from Stage 0 to Stage 3 (Stage 0 intact; Stage 1 the release of the anterior 1/3 LCL complex; Stage 2 the release of the anterior two thirds of the LCL complex; and Stage 3 the release of the entire LCL complex) on each specimen. The mean gap of RCJ and lateral UHJ was used for the comparison between stages with the intact elbow.

RESULTS:

The mean RCJ gap distance in Stage 2 and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 2 P = .008; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3 P = .010). The mean UHJ gap distance of Stage 1, Stage 2, and Stage 3 was significantly increased compared to that in Stage 0 (Stage 0 vs. Stage 1 P = 0.025; Stage 0 vs. Stage 2 P = .010; Stage 0 vs. Stage 3 P = .011). In contrast, the release of the anterior 1/3 of the LCL complex (Stage 1) was not significantly increased compared to the mean joint gap distance of RCJ (P = .157).

CONCLUSION:

Arthroscopic measurement of joint gap widening in RCJ and UHJ is a reliable assessment method to detect LCL complex deficiency that involves the anterior two thirds or more.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ligamentos Laterais do Tornozelo / Ligamentos Colaterais / Articulação do Cotovelo / Instabilidade Articular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ligamentos Laterais do Tornozelo / Ligamentos Colaterais / Articulação do Cotovelo / Instabilidade Articular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article