Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the effectiveness and practicality of erbium lasers for ceramic restoration removal: A retrospective clinical analysis.
Deeb, Janina Golob; Grzech-Lesniak, Kinga; Bencharit, Sompop.
Afiliação
  • Deeb JG; Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
  • Grzech-Lesniak K; Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
  • Bencharit S; Department of Oral Surgery, Laser Laboratory, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
PLoS One ; 18(12): e0295957, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38096248
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and practicality of erbium lasers in the removal of ceramic restorations and appliances from natural teeth and dental implant abutments in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted, involving 29 clinical cases with a total of 52 abutments requiring the removal of various ceramic restorations. The analysis evaluated the clinical procedures performed, including the type and material of the prosthetic, the type of cement used, laser setting parameters, retrieval time, and retrieval success. RESULTS: Out of the 52 abutments, 50 were successfully retrieved without causing any damage (>95%) using either an Er,Cr:YSGG laser (N = 6) or an Er:YAG laser (N = 46). In one case, a crown was partially sectioned to prevent any negative impact of laser irradiation on the adhesive strength between the post and tooth, and in another case, a fracture occurred during debonding. The restorations consisted of 13 lithium disilicate and 39 zirconia units, including six veneers, 38 single crowns, and three fixed partial dentures (FPDs). The retrieval time varied depending on the restoration type, material thickness, cement type, retention form/fitting of the abutment and restoration, ranging from 2.25 ±0.61 minutes for veneers, 6.89 ±8.07 minutes for crowns, to 25 ±10 minutes per abutment for FPDs. Removal of a zirconia crown required more time, 7.12±8.91 minutes, compared to a lithium disilicate crown, 5.86 ±2.41 minutes. The debonding time was influenced by the laser settings as well as materials and types of prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Erbium lasers present a safe and effective alternative to invasive methods for removing ceramic restorations, without causing harm to the abutment or prosthesis. Laser-assisted debonding allows for recementation of the restorations during the same appointment, making it a conservative and viable option for ceramic crown retrieval in clinical settings.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lasers de Estado Sólido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lasers de Estado Sólido Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article