Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Incidence of Acute Rejection Compared With Endomyocardial Biopsy Complications for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era.
Cusi, Vincenzo; Vaida, Florin; Wettersten, Nicholas; Rodgers, Nicholas; Tada, Yuko; Gerding, Bryn; Urey, Marcus Anthony; Greenberg, Barry; Adler, Eric D; Kim, Paul J.
Afiliação
  • Cusi V; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Vaida F; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
  • Wettersten N; Cardiology Section, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA.
  • Rodgers N; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Tada Y; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Gerding B; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Urey MA; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Greenberg B; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Adler ED; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
  • Kim PJ; UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
Transplantation ; 108(5): 1220-1227, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38098137
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The reference standard of detecting acute rejection (AR) in adult heart transplant (HTx) patients is an endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). The majority of EMBs are performed in asymptomatic patients. However, the incidence of treated AR compared with EMB complications has not been compared in the contemporary era (2010-current).

METHODS:

The authors retrospectively analyzed 2769 EMBs obtained in 326 consecutive HTx patients between August 2019 and August 2022. Variables included surveillance versus for-cause indication, recipient and donor characteristics, EMB procedural data and pathological grades, treatment for AR, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS:

The overall EMB complications rate was 1.6%. EMBs performed within 1 mo after HTx compared with after 1 mo from HTx showed significantly increased complications (OR, 12.74, P < 0.001). The treated AR rate was 14.2% in the for-cause EMBs and 1.2% in the surveillance EMBs. We found the incidence of AR versus EMB complications was significantly lower in the surveillance compared with the for-cause EMB group (OR, 0.05, P < 0.001). We also found the incidence of EMB complications was higher than treated AR in surveillance EMBs.

CONCLUSIONS:

The yield of surveillance EMBs has declined in the contemporary era, with a higher incidence of EMB complications compared with detected AR. The risk of EMB complications was highest within 1 mo after HTx. Surveillance EMB protocols in the contemporary era may need to be reevaluated.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Rejeição de Enxerto / Miocárdio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Coração / Rejeição de Enxerto / Miocárdio Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article