Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of pharmacological intervention for smoking cessation in smokers with diseases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Xing, Xin; Shang, Xue; Deng, Xinxin; Guo, Kangle; Fenfen, E; Zhou, Liying; Wang, Yongsheng; Yang, Chaoqun; Yang, Kehu; Li, Xiuxia.
Afiliação
  • Xing X; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Shang X; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
  • Deng X; School of Public Health, Gansu University Of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.
  • Guo K; School of Public Health and Emergency Management, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
  • Fenfen E; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Zhou L; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
  • Wang Y; Health Technology Assessment Center/Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Yang C; Department of infection management, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
  • Yang K; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
  • Li X; Key Laboratory of Evidence-Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, China.
J Evid Based Med ; 16(4): 520-533, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38102895
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate the most effective and best-tolerated drugs for treating diseased smokers.

METHODS:

Eight databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving different pharmacological interventions for smoking cessation in disease patients (January 2023). Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15.1 software. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool assessed the risk of bias, and confidence in evidence was assessed using CINeMA.

RESULTS:

A total of 60 RCTs involving 13,009 patients of 12 disease categories were included. All trials reported 13 interventions, resulting in 78 comparisons. Network meta-analysis showed that varenicline (OR = 2.30, 95% CI (1.77, 3.00)) and bupropion (OR = 1.65, 95% CI (1.29, 2.11)) showed favorable abstinence effects compared to placebo in the cardiovascular disease population. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) had better withdrawal advantages than placebo (OR = 11.18, 95% CI (2.25, 55.54)) in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) population. Some combination treatments showed better results than monotherapy, such as bupropion + NRT was superior to bupropion (OR = 8.45, 95% CI (1.84, 38.89)) and NRT (OR = 4.98, 95% CI (1.25, 19.78)) in mental illness population. The final surface under the cumulative ranking curve indicated that bupropion + NRT achieved the best smoking cessation effect. Overall confidence in the evidence was low. In a comparison of drugs, the results showed that bupropion + NRT had the best safety.

CONCLUSIONS:

Most interventions show the benefit of quitting smoking compared with placebo, including monotherapy and combination therapy. Moreover, varenicline or bupropion combined with NRT is superior to some monotherapies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abandono do Hábito de Fumar Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article