Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab or TAS-102 as third-line or above treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study.
Li, Luchun; Wang, Ting; Wu, Zhijuan; Li, Yan; Ma, Huiwen; Wang, Lulu; Lei, Shuangyi; Chen, Wen.
Afiliação
  • Li L; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Wang T; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Wu Z; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Ma H; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Wang L; Department of Radiotherapy, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Lei S; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
  • Chen W; Department of Oncology, Chongqing University, Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Transl Cancer Res ; 12(11): 3034-3044, 2023 Nov 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38130300
ABSTRACT

Background:

For metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the efficacy of third-line or above treatments is not ideal. Combining targeted vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) biological agents with chemotherapy or anti-programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) treatment can bring longer survival benefits to patients with mCRC compared with the application of a single drug. In this study, fruquintinib was used as the research drug, and the main purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in combination with sintilimab (FS) or trifluridine and tipiracil (TAS-102) (FT) in the third-line or above treatment in mCRC patients.

Methods:

Based on real-world clinical practice, mCRC patients who progressed after second-line or higher-line chemotherapy regimens and received FS or FT as third-line or above treatment from December 2020 to November 2022 were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Safety, disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR) were secondary end points.

Results:

In the FS group, 47 patients received FS, and in the FT group, 45 patients received FT. The DCR values in the FS and FT groups were 80.9% (38/47) and 55.6% (25/45), respectively (P<0.05). The median PFS (mPFS) in the FS group was 6.0 months, and the mPFS in the FT group was 3.5 months (P<0.05). Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2 in severity.

Conclusions:

As a third-line or above regimen in mCRC patients, compared to FT, treatment with FS provides a higher DCR and longer mPFS and is better tolerated. The combination of fruquintinib and sintilimab may become a new treatment option for mCRC patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article