Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Contemporary Management and Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.
Kobayashi, Taisei; Pugliese, Steven; Sethi, Sanjum S; Parikh, Sahil A; Goldberg, Joshua; Alkhafan, Fahad; Vitarello, Clara; Rosenfield, Kenneth; Lookstein, Robert; Keeling, Brent; Klein, Andrew; Gibson, C Michael; Glassmoyer, Lauren; Khandhar, Sameer; Secemsky, Eric; Giri, Jay.
Afiliação
  • Kobayashi T; Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Pugliese S; Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Sethi SS; Center for Interventional Cardiovascular Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Parikh SA; Center for Interventional Cardiovascular Care, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Goldberg J; Cardiothoracic Surgery Division, Westchester Medical Center, Westchester, New York, USA.
  • Alkhafan F; Boston Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Vitarello C; Boston Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Rosenfield K; Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lookstein R; Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Keeling B; Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Klein A; Piedmont Heart Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Gibson CM; Boston Clinical Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Smith Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Glassmoyer L; Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Khandhar S; Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
  • Secemsky E; Smith Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Giri J; Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Perelman School of Medicine. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Penn Cardiovascular Outcomes, Quality and Evaluative Research Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: jay.giri@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 83(1): 35-43, 2024 01 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171708
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Contemporary care patterns/outcomes in high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are unknown.

OBJECTIVES:

This study sought to characterize the management of high-risk PE patients and identify factors associated with poor outcomes.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of the PERT (Pulmonary Embolism Response Team) Consortium Registry was performed. Patients presenting with intermediate-risk PE, high-risk PE, and catastrophic PE (those with hemodynamic collapse) were identified. Patient characteristics were compared with chi-square testing for categorical covariates and Student's t-test for continuous covariates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations between clinical characteristics and outcomes in the high-risk population.

RESULTS:

Of 5,790 registry patients, 2,976 presented with intermediate-risk PE and 1,442 with high-risk PE. High-risk PE patients were more frequently treated with advanced therapies than intermediate-risk PE patients (41.9% vs 30.2%; P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality (20.6% vs 3.7%; P < 0.001) and major bleeding (10.5% vs. 3.5%; P < 0.001) were more common in high-risk PE. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated vasopressor use (OR 4.56; 95% CI 3.27-6.38; P < 0.01), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use (OR 2.86; 95% CI 1.12-7.30; P = 0.03), identified clot-in-transit (OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.13-4.52; P = 0.02), and malignancy (OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.13-2.56; P = 0.01) as factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Catastrophic PE patients (n = 197 [13.7% of high-risk PE patients]) had higher in-hospital mortality (42.1% vs 17.2%; P < 0.001) than those presenting with noncatastrophic high-risk PE. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (13.3% vs. 4.8% P < 0.001) and systemic thrombolysis (25% vs 11.3%; P < 0.001) were used more commonly in catastrophic PE.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the largest analysis of high-risk PE patients to date, mortality rates were high with the worst outcomes among patients with hemodynamic collapse.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Hemorragia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Embolia Pulmonar / Hemorragia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article