Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to Office Hysteroscopy in Fellowship Education and Practice.
Zelivianskaia, Anna; Ramanathan, Aparna R; Qu, Angela; Robinson, James K.
Afiliação
  • Zelivianskaia A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr. Zelivianskaia). Electronic address: anna.zelivianskaia@tuhs.temple.edu.
  • Ramanathan AR; National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington District of Columbia (Dr. Ramanathan).
  • Qu A; Department of Gynecology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle Washington (Dr. Qu).
  • Robinson JK; National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington District of Columbia (Dr. Robinson).
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(4): 280-284.e4, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38190883
ABSTRACT
STUDY

OBJECTIVE:

To identify the top 3 perceived barriers to performing office hysteroscopy (OH) by minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) faculty and fellows and identify opportunities for education on this key topic that will be most effective in fellowship training and MIGS practice.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional survey study targeted at all American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists-accredited Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery fellows, program directors, and associate program directors in February to April 2022. The survey was designed by faculty who have extensive experience in OH procedures. In addition, a literature search was performed to aid with question design. SETTING, PATIENTS, AND

INTERVENTIONS:

This was a REDCap electronic survey administered through the Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery listserv. No additional follow-up was performed after survey completion. The 15-minute survey was sent to 60 program directors, 92 assistant program directors, and 158 fellows, including the incoming class of 2024 and the 2022 fellowship graduates. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

A total of 93 responses were received; 67% of respondents performed OH but 73% of those performed 5 procedures or less per month. Most participants controlled pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs +/- paracervical block. The most common perceived barrier to performing OH was concern over pain management. Other commonly cited concerns were equipment costs, sterilization costs, and office staff training; 37% to 44% of respondents also cited lack of departmental support and insufficient clinic time, respectively, as barriers, and 56% indicated they are interested in educational materials on OH.

CONCLUSION:

Our study suggests general interest in, but a low volume of, OH among MIGS fellows and faculty. The most common perceived barrier was concern regarding pain management. This has been well studied in the literature and likely presents an area for greater education to improve OH utilization. We also uncovered concerns regarding systemic barriers, such as equipment costs, departmental support, and clinic structure. This is an area for further research and advocacy efforts to address barriers to OH on a system level.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Histeroscopia / Bolsas de Estudo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Histeroscopia / Bolsas de Estudo Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article