Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a pharmaceutical science systematic review process using a semi-automated machine learning tool: Intravenous drug compatibility in the neonatal intensive care setting.
De Silva, D Thisuri N; Moore, Brioni R; Strunk, Tobias; Petrovski, Michael; Varis, Vanessa; Chai, Kevin; Ng, Leo; Batty, Kevin T.
Afiliação
  • De Silva DTN; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Moore BR; Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Strunk T; Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Petrovski M; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Varis V; Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Chai K; Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Ng L; Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
  • Batty KT; Neonatal Directorate, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Subiaco, Western Australia, Australia.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 12(1): e1170, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38204432
ABSTRACT
Our objective was to establish and test a machine learning-based screening process that would be applicable to systematic reviews in pharmaceutical sciences. We used the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) model, a broad search strategy, and a machine learning tool (Research Screener) to identify relevant references related to y-site compatibility of 95 intravenous drugs used in neonatal intensive care settings. Two independent reviewers conducted pilot studies, including manual screening and evaluation of Research Screener, and used the kappa-coefficient for inter-reviewer reliability. After initial deduplication of the search strategy results, 27 597 references were available for screening. Research Screener excluded 1735 references, including 451 duplicate titles and 1269 reports with no abstract/title, which were manually screened. The remainder (25 862) were subject to the machine learning screening process. All eligible articles for the systematic review were extracted from <10% of the references available for screening. Moderate inter-reviewer reliability was achieved, with kappa-coefficient ≥0.75. Overall, 324 references were subject to full-text reading and 118 were deemed relevant for the systematic review. Our study showed that a broad search strategy to optimize the literature captured for systematic reviews can be efficiently screened by the semi-automated machine learning tool, Research Screener.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Intensiva Neonatal / Aprendizado de Máquina / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Terapia Intensiva Neonatal / Aprendizado de Máquina / Revisões Sistemáticas como Assunto Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article