Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas with Single-Sided Deafness: Implications for Binaural Hearing.
West, Niels; Sørensen, Rikke Skovhøj; Kressner, Abigail Anne; Bille, Michael; Marozeau, Jeremy; Cayé-Thomasen, Per.
Afiliação
  • West N; Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen Hearing and Balance Center, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Sørensen RS; Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
  • Bille M; Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Copenhagen Hearing and Balance Center, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Marozeau J; Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(2): 128-135, 2024 Feb 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38206060
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs) may have detrimental effects on ipsilateral hearing, commonly leading to single-sided deafness (SSD). Cochlear implantation in patients with ILSs is an option to partly restore ipsilateral hearing; however, the available literature fails to account for the binaural hearing benefits of a cochlear implant (CI) for ILSs.

METHODS:

We prospectively evaluated SSD patients with sporadic ILS undergoing cochlear implantation with simultaneous tumor resection (n = 10) or with tumor observation (n = 1). Patients completed the Speech, Spatial and Qualities Questionnaire (SSQ12) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) pre- and postoperatively, as well as the Bern Benefit in Single-Sided Deafness (BBSSD) questionnaire postoperatively. Patients were also tested postoperatively with and without their CI to measure the effect on localization ability and binaural summation, squelch, and head shadow.

RESULTS:

Evaluation was completed for nine and six patients (subjective and objective data, respectively). The CI significantly improved the speech reception threshold (SRT) in the head shadow condition where the target signal was presented to the CI side and the noise to the front (SCIN0). On the other hand, the SRTs in the colocated condition (S0N0) and the condition where the target signal was presented to the front and the noise to the CI side (S0NCI) were unaffected by the CI. The mean localization error decreased significantly from 102° to 61° (p = 0.0031) with the addition of a CI. The scores from SSQ12 demonstrated nonsignificant changes. For NCIQ, the self-esteem and the social interaction domains increased significantly but insignificantly for the remaining domains. The BBSSD responses ranged from +0.5 to +3.5 points.

CONCLUSION:

After implantation, patients achieved significantly better scores across some of the patient-reported and objective parameters. In addition to reporting on a number of ILS cases where implantation was performed, the study is the first of its kind to document patient-reported and objective binaural hearing improvement after cochlear implantation in patients with ILS and, thereby, lends support to the active management of ILS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Surdez / Neurilemoma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Cocleares / Implante Coclear / Surdez / Neurilemoma Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article