Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sustained inflation and chest compression versus 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns (SURV1VE): A cluster randomised controlled trial.
Schmölzer, Georg M; Pichler, Gerhard; Solevåg, Anne Lee; Law, Brenda Hiu Yan; Mitra, Souvik; Wagner, Michael; Pfurtscheller, Daniel; Yaskina, Maryna; Cheung, Po-Yin.
Afiliação
  • Schmölzer GM; Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada georg.schmoelzer@me.com.
  • Pichler G; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Solevåg AL; Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Law BHY; The Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.
  • Mitra S; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • Wagner M; Departments of Pediatrics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Pfurtscheller D; Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Neonatology, Intensive Care and Pediatric Neurology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Yaskina M; Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Cheung PY; Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 109(4): 428-435, 2024 Jun 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212104
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

In newborn infants requiring chest compression (CC) in the delivery room (DR) does continuous CC superimposed by a sustained inflation (CC+SI) compared with a 31 compressionventilation (31 CV) ratio decreases time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

DESIGN:

International, multicenter, prospective, cluster cross-over randomised trial.

SETTING:

DR in four hospitals in Canada and Austria,

PARTICIPANTS:

Newborn infants >28 weeks' gestation who required CC.

INTERVENTIONS:

Hospitals were randomised to CC+SI or 31 CV then crossed over to the other intervention. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

The primary outcome was time to ROSC, defined as the duration of CC until an increase in heart rate >60/min determined by auscultation of the heart, which was maintained for 60 s. Sample size of 218 infants (109/group) was sufficient to detect a clinically important 33% reduction (282 vs 420 s of CC) in time to ROSC. Analysis was intention-to-treat.

RESULTS:

Patient recruitment occurred between 19 October 2017 and 22 September 2022 and randomised 27 infants (CC+SI (n=12), 31 CV (n=15), two (one per group) declined consent). All 11 infants in the CC+SI group and 12/14 infants in the 31 CV group achieved ROSC in the DR. The median (IQR) time to ROSC was 90 (60-270) s and 615 (174-780) s (p=0.0502 (log rank), p=0.16 (cox proportional hazards regression)) with CC+SI and 31 CV, respectively. Mortality was 2/11 (18.2%) with CC+SI versus 8/14 (57.1%) with 31 CV (p=0.10 (Fisher's exact test), OR (95% CI) 0.17; (0.03 to 1.07)). The trial was stopped due to issues with ethics approval and securing trial insurance as well as funding reasons.

CONCLUSION:

The time to ROSC and mortality was not statistical different between CC+SI and 31 CV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02858583.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asfixia Neonatal / Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Estudos Cross-Over Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asfixia Neonatal / Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Estudos Cross-Over Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article