Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Striatal and Behavioral Responses to Reward Vary by Socioeconomic Status in Adolescents.
Decker, Alexandra L; Meisler, Steven L; Hubbard, Nicholas A; Bauer, Clemens C C; Leonard, Julia; Grotzinger, Hannah; Giebler, Melissa A; Torres, Yesi Camacho; Imhof, Andrea; Romeo, Rachel; Gabrieli, John D E.
Afiliação
  • Decker AL; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 alexandraleerdecker@gmail.com.
  • Meisler SL; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
  • Hubbard NA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
  • Bauer CCC; Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138.
  • Leonard J; Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588.
  • Grotzinger H; McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
  • Giebler MA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
  • Torres YC; Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
  • Imhof A; Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
  • Romeo R; Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
  • Gabrieli JDE; Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
J Neurosci ; 44(11)2024 Mar 13.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38253532
ABSTRACT
Disparities in socioeconomic status (SES) lead to unequal access to financial and social support. These disparities are believed to influence reward sensitivity, which in turn are hypothesized to shape how individuals respond to and pursue rewarding experiences. However, surprisingly little is known about how SES shapes reward sensitivity in adolescence. Here, we investigated how SES influenced adolescent responses to reward, both in behavior and the striatum-a brain region that is highly sensitive to reward. We examined responses to both immediate reward (tracked by phasic dopamine) and average reward rate fluctuations (tracked by tonic dopamine) as these distinct signals independently shape learning and motivation. Adolescents (n = 114; 12-14 years; 58 female) performed a gambling task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. We manipulated trial-by-trial reward and loss outcomes, leading to fluctuations between periods of reward scarcity and abundance. We found that a higher reward rate hastened behavioral responses, and increased guess switching, consistent with the idea that reward abundance increases response vigor and exploration. Moreover, immediate reward reinforced previously rewarding decisions (win-stay, lose-switch) and slowed responses (postreward pausing), particularly when rewards were scarce. Notably, lower-SES adolescents slowed down less after rare rewards than higher-SES adolescents. In the brain, striatal activations covaried with the average reward rate across time and showed greater activations during rewarding blocks. However, these striatal effects were diminished in lower-SES adolescents. These findings show that the striatum tracks reward rate fluctuations, which shape decisions and motivation. Moreover, lower SES appears to attenuate reward-driven behavioral and brain responses.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dopamina / Corpo Estriado Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dopamina / Corpo Estriado Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article