Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of Extra-Prostatic Extension on Deep Learning-Reconstructed High-Resolution Thin-Slice T2-Weighted Images in Patients with Prostate Cancer.
Kim, Mingyu; Kim, Seung Ho; Hong, Sujin; Kim, Yeon Jung; Kim, Hye Ri; Kim, Joo Yeon.
Afiliação
  • Kim M; Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SH; Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
  • Hong S; Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YJ; Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HR; Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JY; Department of Pathology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(2)2024 Jan 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38254901
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic performance for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) and image quality among three image datasets conventional T2-weighted images (T2WIconv, slice thickness, 3 mm) and high-resolution thin-slice T2WI (T2WIHR, 2 mm), with and without deep learning reconstruction (DLR) in patients with prostatic cancer (PCa). A total of 88 consecutive patients (28 EPE-positive and 60 negative) diagnosed with PCa via radical prostatectomy who had undergone 3T-MRI were included. Two independent reviewers performed a crossover review in three sessions, in which each reviewer recorded five-point confidence scores for the presence of EPE and image quality using a five-point Likert scale. Pathologic topographic maps served as the reference standard. For both reviewers, T2WIconv showed better diagnostic performance than T2WIHR with and without DLR (AUCs, in order, for reviewer 1, 0.883, 0.806, and 0.772, p = 0.0006; for reviewer 2, 0.803, 0.762, and 0.745, p = 0.022). The image quality was also the best in T2WIconv, followed by T2WIHR with DLR and T2WIHR without DLR for both reviewers (median, in order, 3, 4, and 5, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, T2WIconv was optimal in regard to image quality and diagnostic performance for the evaluation of EPE in patients with PCa.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article