Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing prostatic artery embolization to surgical and minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Altman, Rachel; Ferreira, Roseanne; Barragan, Camilo; Bhojani, Naeem; Lajkosz, Katherine; Zorn, Kevin C; Chughtai, Bilal; Annamalai, Ganesan; Elterman, Dean S.
Afiliação
  • Altman R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Ferreira R; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Barragan C; Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Bhojani N; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Lajkosz K; Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Zorn KC; Department of Surgery, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
  • Chughtai B; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
  • Annamalai G; Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Elterman DS; Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 22, 2024 Jan 28.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38281906
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To summarize current evidence to report a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open simple prostatectomy (OSP) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS:

A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies published from inception until August 2021. The search terms used were (prostate embolization OR prostatic embolization) AND (prostatic hyperplasia OR prostatic obstruction) as well as the abbreviations of PAE and BPH. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4.

RESULTS:

Seven studies were included with 810 patients five RCTs and one observational study compared PAE with TURP, and one observational study compared PAE with OSP. The included studies had considerable risk of bias concerns. TURP and OSP were associated with more statistically significant improvements in urodynamic measures and BPH symptoms compared to PAE. However, PAE seems to significantly improve erectile dysfunction compared to OSP and improve other outcome measures compared to TURP, although not significantly. PAE appeared to reduce adverse events and report more minor complications compared with TURP and OSP, but it is unclear whether PAE is more effective in the long-term.

CONCLUSION:

PAE is an emerging treatment option for patients with symptomatic BPH who cannot undergo surgery or have undergone failed medical therapy. Overall, PAE groups reported fewer adverse events. Future ongoing and longer-term studies are needed to provide better insight into the benefit of PAE compared to other treatment options.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Embolização Terapêutica / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata / Embolização Terapêutica / Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article