Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cold Snare Polypectomy in Small (<10 mm) Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Canakis, Andrew; Chandan, Saurabh; Bapaye, Jay; Canakis, Justin; Twery, Benjamin; Mohan, Babu P; Ramai, Daryl; Facciorusso, Antonio; Bilal, Mohammad; Adler, Douglas G.
Afiliação
  • Canakis A; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Chandan S; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE.
  • Bapaye J; Department of Internal Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY.
  • Canakis J; Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
  • Twery B; Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Mohan BP; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Ramai D; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Facciorusso A; Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
  • Bilal M; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota and Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN.
  • Adler DG; Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy (CATE), Centura Health, Porter Adventist Hospital, Denver, CO.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 370-377, 2024 Apr 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38289665
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Endoscopic removal techniques for colorectal polyps include cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP). Although HSP is recommended for pedunculated polyps (PPs) larger than 10 mm, data regarding use of CSP for PPs <10 mm continues to emerge. We aimed to investigate outcomes of these techniques in small (<10 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyps.

METHODS:

Multiple databases were searched till June 2022 to identify studies involving the removal of small PPs with CSP and HSP. Random effects model was used to calculate outcomes and 95% CI. Primary outcome was the pooled rate of successful en-bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were immediate and delayed bleeding with CSP and HSP as well as prophylactic and post resection clip placement.

RESULTS:

Six studies including 1025 patients (1111 polyps with a mean size 4 to 8.5 mm) were analyzed. 116 and 995 polyps were removed with HSP and CSP, respectively. The overall pooled rate of successful en-bloc resection with CSP was 99.7% (CI 99.1-99.9; I2 0%). Pooled immediate and delayed bleeding after CSP was 49.8% (CI 46.8-52.91; I2 98%) and 0% (CI 0.00-0.00; I2 0%), respectively. Delayed bleeding was higher with HSP, relative risk 0.05 (CI 0.01-0.43; I2 0%), P =0.006, whereas immediate bleeding was higher with CSP, relative risk 7.89 (CI 4.36-14.29; I2 0%), P <0.00001. Pooled rates of prophylactic clip placement and post-procedure clip placement (to control immediate bleeding) were 55.3% and 47.2%, respectively. Finally, right colon polyp location significantly correlated with frequency of immediate bleeding.

CONCLUSION:

Our analysis shows that CSP is safe and effective for resection of small PPs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscopia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Colonoscopia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article