Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Wolf creek XVII part 4: Amplifying lay-rescuer response.
Dainty, Katie N; Yng Ng, Yih; Pin Pek, Pin; Koster, Rudolph W; Eng Hock Ong, Marcus.
Afiliação
  • Dainty KN; Patient-Centered Outcomes, North York General Hospital Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Canada.
  • Yng Ng Y; Digital and Smart Health Office, Ng Teng Fong Centre for Healthcare Innovation Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
  • Pin Pek P; Prehospital and Emergency Research Centre, Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Koster RW; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands.
  • Eng Hock Ong M; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Resusc Plus ; 17: 100547, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38292468
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Amplifying lay-rescuer response is a key priority to increase survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We describe the current state of lay-rescuer response, how we envision the future, and the gaps, barriers, and research priorities that will amplify response to OHCA.

Methods:

'Amplifying Lay-Rescuer Response' was one of six focus topics for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Conference invitees included international thought leaders and scientists in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation from academia and industry. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category that was debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category.

Results:

The top five knowledge gaps as ranked by the panel, reflected a recognition of the need to better understand the psycho-social aspects of lay response. The top five barriers to translation reflected issues at the individual, community, societal, structural, and governmental levels. The top five research priorities were focused on understanding the social/psychological and emotional barriers to action, finding the most effective/cost-effective strategies to educate lay persons and implement community life-saving interventions, evaluation of new technological solutions and how to enhance the role of dispatch working with lay-rescuers.

Conclusion:

Future research in lay rescuer response should incorporate technology innovations, understand the "humanity" of the situation, leverage implementation science and systems thinking to save lives. This will require the field of resuscitation to engage with scholars outside our traditional ranks and to be open to new ways of thinking about old problems.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article