Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of Extraction Procedure Substitution on Automated Tacrolimus, Sirolimus, and Cyclosporine Assays.
Chandras, Athanasia; Mendu, Damodara R; Kirchhoff, Daniel C.
Afiliação
  • Chandras A; Department of Pathology, Molecular & Cell Based Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
  • Mendu DR; Department of Pathology, Molecular & Cell Based Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
  • Kirchhoff DC; Department of Pathology, Molecular & Cell Based Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, United States.
J Appl Lab Med ; 9(3): 573-578, 2024 May 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300648
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

An erroneously high tacrolimus level was reported to a clinician. A root cause analysis investigation failed to determine the cause of the error. It was suspected that the incorrect preanalytical extraction reagent and procedure was used during testing; however, how this would affect the assayed drug concentration was unclear. Here we investigated the effect of the substitution of sirolimus, tacrolimus, and cyclosporine extraction reagents on assayed drug concentration.

METHODS:

Tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine concentration were measured on the Abbott Architect i2000 analyzer. Each assay requires a preanalytical extraction step, with a distinct reagent. We investigated the effect of the substitution of the extraction reagents and procedure between the 3 assays on the measured drug concentration. Two experiments were performed, one on samples of known drug concentration and one on samples with no drug present.

RESULTS:

Substituting cyclosporine and sirolimus extraction procedures increased assayed tacrolimus concentrations from 5.6 to 8.47 (+51.25%) and 8.13 (+45.18%) ng/mL, respectively. Extraction procedure substitutions decreased assayed sirolimus from 13.63 to 4.60 (-66.25%) and 8.07 (-40.79%) ng/mL for cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Cyclosporine concentration increased from 274.60 to 391.30 (+42.50%) ng/mL using sirolimus extraction reagents and to 757.30 (+175.78%) ng/mL using tacrolimus extraction reagents. Cross-reactivity was observed between the tacrolimus assay and sirolimus and cyclosporine extraction reagents.

CONCLUSIONS:

Significant changes, both positive and negative, are observed in assayed drug concentration when incorrect extraction procedures are used in the Abbott i2000 tacrolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine assays. Preanalytic extraction procedures should be investigated when performing root cause analysis for erroneous therapeutic drug values.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tacrolimo / Ciclosporina / Sirolimo / Imunossupressores Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tacrolimo / Ciclosporina / Sirolimo / Imunossupressores Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article