Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Variation in cervical cancer screening test utilization and results in a United States-based program.
Dorismond, Vanessa G; Saraiya, Mona; Gopalani, Sameer V; Soman, Ashwini; Kenney, Kristy; Miller, Jacqueline; Sawaya, George F.
Afiliação
  • Dorismond VG; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: vanessa.dorismond@ucsf.edu.
  • Saraiya M; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Gopalani SV; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
  • Soman A; CyberData Technologies, Herndon, VA, USA.
  • Kenney K; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Miller J; Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Sawaya GF; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences; University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Center for Healthcare Value, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Gynecol Oncol ; 184: 96-102, 2024 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38301312
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Little is known about cervical cancer screening strategy utilization (cytology alone, cytology plus high-risk human papillomavirus [HPV] testing [cotesting], primary HPV testing) and test results in the United States.

METHODS:

Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program were analyzed for 199,578 persons aged 21-65 years screened from 2019 to 2020. Screening test utilization and results were stratified by demographic characteristics and geographic region. Age-standardized pooled HPV test positivity and genotyping test positivity were estimated within cytology result categories.

RESULTS:

Primary HPV testing was performed in 592 persons (0.3%). Among the remaining 176,290 persons aged 30-65 years, cotesting was utilized in 72.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.9-72.3%), and cytology alone was utilized in 27.9% (95% CI 27.7-28.1%). Utilization of cytology alone varied by geographic region, ranging from 18.3% (95% CI 17.4-19.1%) to 49.0% (95% CI 48.4-49.6%). HPV genotyping test utilization among those with positive pooled HPV test results was 33.9%. In persons aged ≥30 years, variations in age-adjusted test results by region were observed for pooled HPV-positive test results and for HPV genotyping-positive test results.

CONCLUSIONS:

Cervical cancer screening strategy utilization and test results vary substantially by geographic region within a national screening program. Variation in utilization may be due to regional differences in screening test availability or the preferences of healthcare systems, screened persons and/or clinicians. Test result variations may reflect differing risk factors for HPV infections by geographic region.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Infecções por Papillomavirus / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article