Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Synthesis of a Novel Gold(I) Complex and Evaluation of Its Anticancer Properties in Breast Cancer Cells.
Khan, Haseeb Ahmad; Isab, Anvarhusein Abdulkadir; Alhomida, Abdullah Saleh; Gatasheh, Mansour Khalil; Alhoshani, Ali Rashid; Aldhafeeri, Bashayr Ahmed; Prasad, N Rajendra.
Afiliação
  • Khan HA; Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  • Isab AA; Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhomida AS; Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  • Gatasheh MK; Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alhoshani AR; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  • Aldhafeeri BA; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
  • Prasad NR; Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, India.
Anticancer Agents Med Chem ; 24(5): 379-388, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305390
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Platinum complexes are commonly used for cancer chemotherapy; however, they are not only highly-priced but also have various side effects. It is, therefore, important to design affordable anticancer drugs with minimal side effects.

METHODS:

We synthesized a new gold(I) complex, PF6{(BDPEA)(TPPMS) digold(I)} (abbreviated as PBTDG) and tested its cytotoxicity in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. We also evaluated the effects of PBTDG on mitochondrial membrane potential, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

RESULTS:

The IC50 values for PBTDG and sorafenib were found to be 1.48 µM and 4.45 µM, respectively. Exposure to PBTDG caused significant and concentration-dependent depletion of ATP and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential. PBTDG induced 2.6, 3.6, and 5.7-fold apoptosis for 1 µM, 3 µM, and 10 µM concentrations, respectively. The induction of apoptosis by the same concentrations of sorafenib was 1.2, 1.3, and 1.6-fold, respectively. The low concentration of PBTDG (1 µM) induced the generation of ROS by 99.83%, which was significantly higher than the ROS generation caused by the same concentration of sorafenib (73.76%). The ROS induction caused by higher concentrations (5 µM) of PBTDG and sorafenib were 104.95% and 122.11%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The lower concentration of PBTDG produced similar cytotoxicity and apoptotic effects that were caused by a comparatively higher concentration of known anticancer drug (sorafenib). The anticancer effects of PBTDG are attributed to its tendency to disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential, induction of apoptosis and generation of ROS. Further studies are warranted to test the anticancer effects of PBTDG in animal models of cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias / Antineoplásicos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article