Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Are the Diagnosis-Specific Thresholds of Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?
Emara, Ahmed K; Pasqualini, Ignacio; Jin, Yuxuan; Klika, Alison K; Orr, Melissa N; Rullán, Pedro J; Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
Afiliação
  • Emara AK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Pasqualini I; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Jin Y; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Klika AK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Orr MN; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Rullán PJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
  • Piuzzi NS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Arthroplasty ; 39(7): 1783-1788.e2, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331359
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) thresholds for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) pain, physical short form (PS), and joint replacement (JR) 1 year after primary total hip arthroplasty stratified by preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) versus non-OA.

METHODS:

A prospective institutional cohort of 5,887 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (January 2016 to December 2018) was included. There were 4,184 patients (77.0%) who completed a one-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, and baseline and one-year HOOS pain, PS, and JR scores were recorded. Patients were stratified by preoperative diagnosis OA or non-OA. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and MCIDs were estimated using a distribution-based approach. The PASS values were estimated using an anchor-based approach, which corresponded to a response to a satisfaction question at one year post surgery.

RESULTS:

The MCID thresholds were slightly higher in the non-OA cohort versus OA patients. (HOOS-Pain OA 8.35 versus non-OA 8.85 points; HOOS-PS OA 9.47 versus non-OA 9.90 points; and HOOS-JR OA 7.76 versus non-OA 8.46 points). Similarly, all MDC thresholds were consistently higher in the non-OA cohort compared to OA patients. The OA cohort exhibited similar or higher PASS thresholds compared to the non-OA cohort for HOOS-Pain (OA ≥80.6 versus non-OA ≥77.5 points), HOOS-PS (OA ≥83.6 versus non-OA ≥83.6 points), and HOOS-JR (OA ≥76.8 versus non-OA ≥73.5 points). A similar percentage of patients achieved MCID and PASS thresholds regardless of preoperative diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

While MCID and MDC thresholds for all HOOS subdomains were slightly higher among non-OA than OA patients, PASS thresholds for HOOS pain and JR were slightly higher in the OA group. The absolute magnitude of the difference in these thresholds may not be sufficient to cause major clinical differences. However, these subtle differences may have a significant impact when used as indicators of operative success in a population setting.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Diferença Mínima Clinicamente Importante Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article