Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Transrectal Prostate Biopsy Approach in Men Undergoing Kidney Transplant: A Retrospective Cohort Study at Three Referral Academic Centers.
Dell'Atti, Lucio; Slyusar, Viktoria; Ronchi, Piero; Manno, Stefano; Cambise, Chiara.
Afiliação
  • Dell'Atti L; Department of Urology, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Slyusar V; Pain Therapy Center, Division of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Ronchi P; Department of Urology, University-Hospital of Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
  • Manno S; Department of Urology, University-Hospital Renato Dulbecco, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Cambise C; Department of Emergency, University-Hospital Gemelli IRCSS, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(3)2024 Jan 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38337782
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, there are no studies evaluating the feasibility of a prostate biopsy approach in men undergoing a kidney transplant (KT). Owing to this evidence, we planned a retrospective population-based study to evaluate our experience of a transrectal prostate biopsy (TR-PB) approach and studied the impact on the complication rate and outcomes in patients undergoing KT with suspected prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS:

We collected data from KT patients who underwent PB with a transrectal approach. One week and two weeks after the PB, patients' information was collected regarding possible complications during the post-biopsy period.

RESULTS:

A total of 121 patients were included in this study. Among them, Group 1 was composed of 59 patients undergoing TR-PB with an ultrasound (US) standard technique, and Group 2 consisted of 62 patients undergoing TR-PB with an MRI-US cognitive technique. We observed a 28.9% Clavien-Dindo grade ≤ 2 of early side effect rates (mostly rectal bleeding and other minor hematuria), with a very low rate of hospital re-admission for acute urinary retention (3.3%); only one man required hospitalization for rectal bleeding, and there were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS:

We can affirm that TR-PB can be a safe procedure with a low risk of severe complications when performed by skilled specialists with a standardized procedural pathway.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article