Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cumulative live birth rate of in vitro fertilization cycle via progestin-primed ovarian stimulation versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve: an open-label, randomized controlled trial.
Ye, Hongjuan; Shi, Liya; Quan, Xinxin; Hou, Min; Ma, Huilan; Xue, Songguo; Yu, Zhao; Chen, Qiuju; Sun, Lihua.
Afiliação
  • Ye H; School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Shi L; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Quan X; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Hou M; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Ma H; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Xue S; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Yu Z; Department of Reproductive Medicine Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Chen Q; School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
  • Sun L; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 27(1): 2316005, 2024 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357937
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) of progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol for in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle in infertile women with normal ovarian reserve (NOR). Infertile women with NOR who underwent their first IVF cycle were enrolled in an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned 11 to receive a freeze-all strategy with delayed embryo transfer (PPOS group, n = 174) and fresh embryo transfer first (GnRH-ant group, n = 174). The primary outcome was the cLBR per aspiration. The cLBR between the PPOS group and GnRH-ant group were comparable (55.75% vs. 52.87%, p = 0.591). A premature luteinizing hormone surge was not observed in the PPOS group, while there were six cases (3.45%) in the GnRH-ant group, but no premature ovulation in either of the groups. The pregnancy outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate, were all comparable. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes and viable embryos were similar (all p > 0.05) between the two groups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reserva Ovariana / Infertilidade Feminina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reserva Ovariana / Infertilidade Feminina Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article