Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Did temporomandibular gap arthroplasty with temporalis interpositional flap improve function and pain in patients with end-stage joint disease? A 5-year retrospective follow-up.
Bazsefidpay, Nikoo; Ulmner, Mattias; Lund, Bodil.
Afiliação
  • Bazsefidpay N; Head-Neck and Plastic Surgery Clinic, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden; School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden. Electronic address: nikoo.bazsefidpay@regionorebrolan.se.
  • Ulmner M; Medical Unit of Plastic Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lund B; Medical Unit of Plastic Surgery and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(5): 578-584, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38368213
ABSTRACT
The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with end-stage temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disease treated with gap arthroplasty with temporalis interpositional flap (GAT) had improved maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and TMJ pain in a long-term perspective. All patients with severe osteoarthritis, or fibrous or bony ankyloses, and subjected to GAT between 2008 and 2015 were included. The criteria of treatment success were TMJ pain VAS score ≤4 and MIO ≥30 mm. Reoperation was considered as a failure. Forty-four patients (mean age 47 years) were included in this retrospective descriptive case series and followed up for up to 7 years (mean 4.5). Comorbidities were frequent (n = 34) and most commonly rheumatic disease (n = 17). The indications for surgery were ankylosis (n = 32) or severe osteoarthritis (n = 12). Of the 44 included patients, 84% (n = 37) had a history of earlier TMJ surgery. The preoperative mean values for TMJ pain and MIO (VAS 7 and 23 mm, respectively) changed significantly (p < 0.001) to postoperative means of VAS 3 and 34 mm, respecitvely. The success rate was 59% (n = 26). When compared with a previous 2-year follow-up, the success rate was found to have decreased over time (p = 0.0097). The rate of successful treatment outcome in terms of MIO alone was 82% (n = 36). The most common reason for treatment failure was residual pain. In conclusion, the success-rate after GAT did not show long-term stability and continued to drop over time in this patient cohort. TMJ pain seems to be the main reason for failure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artroplastia / Retalhos Cirúrgicos / Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article