Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast Reconstruction: A Skin-to-Skin Study.
Aesthet Surg J
; 44(8): 829-837, 2024 Jul 15.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38377366
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Since the early 2000s, acellular dermal matrix has been a popular adjunct to prepectoral breast reconstruction to enhance outcomes.OBJECTIVES:
The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in the postoperative course of 2 standard acellular dermal matrix products, AlloDerm SELECT Ready To Use and DermACELL.METHODS:
A prospective, patient-blind study of patients undergoing bilateral nipple and/or skin-sparing mastectomies with either tissue expander or silicone implant insertion between 2019 and 2022 were selected for this study. The study design used patients as their own controls between 2 products randomly assigned to the left or right breast. Outcomes between the products included average time for drain removal, infection rate, seroma rate, and incorporation rates.RESULTS:
The prospective clinical data of 55 patients (110 breasts) were recorded for 90 days. There were no significant differences between drain removal time, average drain output, or seroma aspiration amount. A higher percentage of seromas was recorded in the breasts with AlloDerm (30.91%) compared with breasts containing DermACELL (14.55%, P < .05), and a statistically significant difference between the incorporation rates of AlloDerm (93.4%) and DermACELL (99.8%, P < .05) was observed.CONCLUSIONS:
Irrespective of patient demographic disparities, both products had a 94.55% success rate for reconstruction outcomes. AlloDerm was determined to have a higher incidence of seromas as a postoperative complication and a trend to lower incorporation.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Seroma
/
Derme Acelular
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article