Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Establishing guidelines for sentinel lymph node ultrastaging in endometrial cancer.
Chiang, Sarah; Tessier-Cloutier, Basile; Klein, Eric; Ardon, Orly; Mueller, Jennifer J; Leitao, Mario M; Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R; Ellenson, Lora H.
Afiliação
  • Chiang S; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA chiangs@mskcc.org.
  • Tessier-Cloutier B; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Klein E; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Ardon O; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
  • Mueller JJ; Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Leitao MM; Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Abu-Rustum NR; Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ellenson LH; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 34(5): 681-688, 2024 May 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38388180
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many sentinel lymph node (SLN) ultrastaging protocols for endometrial cancer exist, but there is no consensus method.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aims to develop guidelines for size criteria in SLN evaluation for endometrial cancer, to determine whether a single cytokeratin AE1AE3 immunohistochemical slide provides sufficient data for diagnosis, and to compare cost efficiency between current and limited ultrastaging protocols at a large tertiary care institution.

METHODS:

Our current SLN ultrastaging protocol consists of cutting two adjacent paraffin block sections at two levels (L1 and L2), 50 µm apart, with two slides at each level stained with hematoxylin and eosin and cytokeratin AE1AE3 immunohistochemistry. We retrospectively reviewed digitized L1 and L2 slides of all positive ultrastaged SLNs from patients treated for endometrial cancer between January 2013 and January 2020. SLN diagnosis was defined by measuring the largest cluster of contiguous tumor cells in a single cross section macrometastasis (>2.0 mm), micrometastasis (>0.2 to ≤2.0 mm or >200 cells), or isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm or ≤200 cells). Concordance between L1 and L2 results was evaluated. Cost efficiency between current (two immunohistochemical slides per block) and proposed limited (one immunohistochemical slide per block) protocols was compared.

RESULTS:

Digitized slides of 147 positive SLNs from 109 patients were reviewed; 4.1% of SLNs were reclassified based on refined size criteria. Complete concordance between L1 and L2 interpretations was seen in 91.8% of SLNs. A false-negative rate of 0%-0.9% in detecting micrometastasis and macrometastasis using a limited protocol was observed. Estimated charge-level savings of a limited protocol were 50% per patient.

CONCLUSION:

High diagnostic accuracy in SLN interpretation may be achieved using a limited ultrastaging protocol of one immunohistochemical slide per block and linear measurement of the largest cluster of contiguous tumor cells. Implementation of the proposed limited ultrastaging protocol may result in laboratory cost savings with minimal impact on health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Linfonodo Sentinela Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela / Linfonodo Sentinela Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article