Treatment effect estimation using the propensity score in clinical trials with historical control.
BMC Med Res Methodol
; 24(1): 47, 2024 Feb 22.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38389058
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Clinical trials assessing new treatment effects require a control group to compare the pure treatment effects. However, in clinical trials on regenerative medicine, rare diseases, and intractable diseases, it may be ethically difficult to assign participants to the control group. In recent years, the use of historical control data has attracted attention as a method for supplementing the number of participants in the control group. When combining historical control data with new randomized controlled trial (RCT) data, the assessment of heterogeneity using outcome data is not sufficient. Therefore, several statistical methods that consider participant outcomes and baseline characteristics, including the propensity score (PS) method have been proposed.METHODS:
We propose a new method considering "information on whether the data are RCT data or not" in the PS model when combining the RCT and historical control data. The performance of the proposed method in estimating the treatment effect is evaluated using simulation data.RESULTS:
When the distribution of covariates is similar between the RCT and historical control data, not much difference in performance is found between the proposed and conventional methods to estimate the treatment effect. On the other hand, when the distribution of covariates is not similar between the two kinds of data, the proposed method shows higher performance.CONCLUSIONS:
Even when it is not known whether RCT and historical control data are similar, the proposed PS model is useful to estimate the treatment effect appropriately in RCTs using historical control data.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Projetos de Pesquisa
Idioma:
En
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article