Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The potential of proximal junctional kyphosis prevention using a novel tether pedicle screw construct: an in silico study comparing the influence of standard and dynamic techniques on adjacent-level range of motion and load pattern.
Decker, Sebastian; Koller, Heiko; Overes, Tom; Montali, Andrea; Clin, Julien; Hachem, Bahe.
Afiliação
  • Decker S; 1Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
  • Koller H; 2International Center for Spinal Disease and Deformities, Asklepios Clinics Bad Abbach, Germany.
  • Overes T; 6Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • Montali A; 3Ignite Concepts GmbH, Biberist, Switzerland.
  • Clin J; 4Technology Transfer, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland; and.
  • Hachem B; 5Numalogics, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 40(5): 611-621, 2024 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394650
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

A tether pedicle screw (TPS) enables individual stepless pretensioning and is placed at one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV+1 and UIV+2, respectively). This study aimed to evaluate a novel customized TPS for the prevention of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and to investigate the potential to generate a smoother force transition from cranial to long fusion during trunk flexion, instead of an abrupt change at the UIV, following adult spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS:

A finite element model was designed based on an adult patient with spinal deformity instrumented from T10 to S1. Five different sagittal balance types and implant configurations were tested. The proximal range of motion (ROM) and intervertebral stress were examined, with a special focus on their respective discontinuities.

RESULTS:

Tension shielding at UIV/UIV+1 by the TPS was consistent irrespective of sagittal profiles. The use of TPSs at UIV+1 and UIV+2 increased the efficacy in reducing spinal ROM discontinuity at UIV/UIV+1, as compared with the use of TPSs at UIV+1 only. Through the use of two pairs of TPSs cranial to the UIV, the optimal tension configuration could be defined to avoid a reduction effect at UIV+1. Neither the addition of transition rods to the TPSs nor the use of transition rods in combination with standard pedicle screws improved the junctional mechanics when compared with TPSs at UIV+1/UIV+2.

CONCLUSIONS:

A smoother motion discontinuity at the UIV can be achieved via implementation of a TPS strategy. This new technology shows favorable in silico mechanics for reducing the risk of PJK.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Parafusos Pediculares / Cifose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fusão Vertebral / Amplitude de Movimento Articular / Análise de Elementos Finitos / Parafusos Pediculares / Cifose Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article