Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Beam quality and the mystery behind the lower percentage depth dose in grid radiation therapy.
Karimi, Amir Hossein; Das, Indra J; Chegeni, Nahid; Jabbari, Iraj; Jafari, Fatemeh; Geraily, Ghazale.
Afiliação
  • Karimi AH; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Das IJ; Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Chegeni N; Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. indra.das@nm.org.
  • Jabbari I; Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
  • Jafari F; Department of Nuclear Engineering, Faculty of Physics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Geraily G; Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 4510, 2024 02 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402259
ABSTRACT
Grid therapy recently has been picking momentum due to favorable outcomes in bulky tumors. This is being termed as Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) and lattice therapy. SFRT can be performed with specially designed blocks made with brass or cerrobend with repeated holes or using multi-leaf collimators where dosimetry is uncertain. The dosimetric challenge in grid therapy is the mystery behind the lower percentage depth dose (PDD) in grid fields. The knowledge about the beam quality, indexed by TPR20/10 (Tissue Phantom Ratio), is also necessary for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. Since the grid may change the quality of the primary photons, a new [Formula see text] should be evaluated for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. A Monte Carlo (MC) approach is provided to resolving the dosimetric issues. Using 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator, MC simulation was performed using MCNPX code. Additionally, a commercial grid therapy device was used to simulate the grid fields. Beam parameters were validated with MC model for output factor, depth of maximum dose, PDDs, dose profiles, and TPR20/10. The electron and photon spectra were also compared between open and grid fields. The dmax is the same for open and grid fields. The PDD with grid is lower (~ 10%) than the open field. The difference in TPR20/10 of open and grid fields is observable (~ 5%). Accordingly, TPR20/10 is still a good index for the beam quality in grid fields and consequently choose the correct [Formula see text] in measurements. The output factors for grid fields are 0.2 lower compared to open fields. The lower depth dose with grid therapy is due to lower depth fluence with scatter radiation but it does not impact the dosimetry as the calibration parameters are insensitive to the effective beam energies. Thus, standard dosimetry in open beam based on international protocol could be used.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Fótons Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Fótons Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article