Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fractional excretion of sodium and potassium and urinary strong ion difference in the evaluation of persistent AKI in sepsis.
Contrera Rolón, Nicolás; Cantos, Joaquín; Huespe, Iván; Prado, Eduardo; Bratti, Griselda I; Schreck, Carlos; Giannasi, Sergio; Rosa Diez, Guillermo; Varela, Carlos F.
Afiliação
  • Contrera Rolón N; Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: nicolas.contrerarolon@hospitalitaliano.org.ar.
  • Cantos J; Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Huespe I; Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Prado E; Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Bratti GI; Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Schreck C; Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Giannasi S; Critical Care Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Rosa Diez G; Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Varela CF; Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403531
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of FENa (Fractional excretion of sodium), FEK (fractional excretion of potassium) and uSID (urinary strong ion difference) in predicting pAKI in sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Two intensive care units in Argentina. PATIENTS Adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock and AKI, and had a urinary biochemistry within 24h of the AKI diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FENa, FEK and uSID through a ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve analysis.

RESULTS:

80 patients were included. 40 patients presented pAKI. pAKI group had higher APACHE, SOFA score, and mortality rate. In the ROC curve analysis, uSID had no diagnostic utility (AUC=0.52, p=0.69). FENa presented moderate accuracy showing an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.60-0.83; p=0.001), while FEK presented low accuracy with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.57-0.80; p=0.04). The optimal Youden point for identifying pAKI was at a FENa higher than 0.51 % with a specificity of 72.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%. In the case of FEK, a value higher than 21.9 % presented the best relation, with a specificity of 67.5% and a sensitivity of 65.0%.

CONCLUSIONS:

urine biochemistry interpretation in septic patients must be revised. FENa and FEK are related to the severity of AKI and could be helpful complementary tools for diagnosing pAKI.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article