Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework.
Berardi, Chiara; Antonini, Marcello; Jordan, Zephanie; Wechtler, Heidi; Paolucci, Francesco; Hinwood, Madeleine.
Afiliação
  • Berardi C; Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. chiara.berardi@uon.edu.au.
  • Antonini M; School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
  • Jordan Z; Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.
  • Wechtler H; Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
  • Paolucci F; Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
  • Hinwood M; Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Hunter St & Auckland St, 2300, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 243, 2024 Feb 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38408938
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development.

METHODS:

We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles.

RESULTS:

Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients' intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health.

CONCLUSION:

It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Qualitativa / Tecnologia Digital / Política de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Mental Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pesquisa Qualitativa / Tecnologia Digital / Política de Saúde / Serviços de Saúde Mental Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article