Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude of Researchers Towards Using ChatGPT in Research.
Abdelhafiz, Ahmed Samir; Ali, Asmaa; Maaly, Ayman Mohamed; Ziady, Hany Hassan; Sultan, Eman Anwar; Mahgoub, Mohamed Anwar.
Afiliação
  • Abdelhafiz AS; Department of Clinical pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Kasr Al-Aini Street, from Elkhalig Square, Cairo, 11796, Egypt. ahmed.samir@nci.cu.edu.eg.
  • Ali A; Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Abbassia Chest Hospital, Ministry of Health and Population, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Maaly AM; Department of Anaesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Ziady HH; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Sultan EA; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Mahgoub MA; Department of Microbiology, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
J Med Syst ; 48(1): 26, 2024 Feb 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411833
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

ChatGPT, a recently released chatbot from OpenAI, has found applications in various aspects of life, including academic research. This study investigated the knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes of researchers towards using ChatGPT and other chatbots in academic research.

METHODS:

A pre-designed, self-administered survey using Google Forms was employed to conduct the study. The questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge of ChatGPT and other chatbots, their awareness of current chatbot and artificial intelligence (AI) applications, and their attitudes towards ChatGPT and its potential research uses.

RESULTS:

Two hundred researchers participated in the survey. A majority were female (57.5%), and over two-thirds belonged to the medical field (68%). While 67% had heard of ChatGPT, only 11.5% had employed it in their research, primarily for rephrasing paragraphs and finding references. Interestingly, over one-third supported the notion of listing ChatGPT as an author in scientific publications. Concerns emerged regarding AI's potential to automate researcher tasks, particularly in language editing, statistics, and data analysis. Additionally, roughly half expressed ethical concerns about using AI applications in scientific research.

CONCLUSION:

The increasing use of chatbots in academic research necessitates thoughtful regulation that balances potential benefits with inherent limitations and potential risks. Chatbots should not be considered authors of scientific publications but rather assistants to researchers during manuscript preparation and review. Researchers should be equipped with proper training to utilize chatbots and other AI tools effectively and ethically.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Análise de Dados Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inteligência Artificial / Análise de Dados Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article