Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial Intelligence as Supporting Reader in Breast Screening: A Novel Workflow to Preserve Quality and Reduce Workload.
Ng, Annie Y; Glocker, Ben; Oberije, Cary; Fox, Georgia; Sharma, Nisha; James, Jonathan J; Ambrózay, Éva; Nash, Jonathan; Karpati, Edith; Kerruish, Sarah; Kecskemethy, Peter D.
Afiliação
  • Ng AY; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • Glocker B; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • Oberije C; Imperial College London, Department of Computing, London, UK.
  • Fox G; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • Sharma N; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • James JJ; Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Department of Radiology, Leeds, UK.
  • Ambrózay É; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham, UK.
  • Nash J; MaMMa Egészségügyi Zrt., Breast Diagnostic Department, Kecskemét, Hungary.
  • Karpati E; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • Kerruish S; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
  • Kecskemethy PD; Kheiron Medical Technologies, London, UK.
J Breast Imaging ; 5(3): 267-276, 2023 May 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416889
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of a new strategy for using artificial intelligence (AI) as supporting reader for the detection of breast cancer in mammography-based double reading screening practice.

METHODS:

Large-scale multi-site, multi-vendor data were used to retrospectively evaluate a new paradigm of AI-supported reading. Here, the AI served as the second reader only if it agrees with the recall/no-recall decision of the first human reader. Otherwise, a second human reader made an assessment followed by the standard clinical workflow. The data included 280 594 cases from 180 542 female participants screened for breast cancer at seven screening sites in two countries and using equipment from four hardware vendors. The statistical analysis included non-inferiority and superiority testing of cancer screening performance and evaluation of the reduction in workload, measured as arbitration rate and number of cases requiring second human reading.

RESULTS:

Artificial intelligence as a supporting reader was found to be superior or noninferior on all screening metrics compared with human double reading while reducing the number of cases requiring second human reading by up to 87% (245 395/280 594). Compared with AI as an independent reader, the number of cases referred to arbitration was reduced from 13% (35 199/280 594) to 2% (5056/280 594).

CONCLUSION:

The simulation indicates that the proposed workflow retains screening performance of human double reading while substantially reducing the workload. Further research should study the impact on the second human reader because they would only assess cases in which the AI prediction and first human reader disagree.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Inteligência Artificial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Inteligência Artificial Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article