Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical Importance of Cannabinoid Type 1 Receptor (CB1R) and Cannabinoid Type 2 Receptor (CB2R) Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Deligiannis, Dimitrios; Anastasiou, Ioannis; Mitropoulos, Dionysios; Mitsos, Panagiotis; Theocharis, Stamatios.
Afiliação
  • Deligiannis D; Department of Urology, Naval Hospital of Athens, Athens, GRC.
  • Anastasiou I; First Department of Urology, Medical School, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
  • Mitropoulos D; First Department of Urology, Medical School, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
  • Mitsos P; Department of Urology, Agia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, GRC.
  • Theocharis S; First Department of Pathology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, GRC.
Cureus ; 16(2): e55121, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420293
ABSTRACT
Background and objective The purpose of our study was to assess the expression of cannabinoid type 1 receptor (CB1R) and cannabinoid type 2 receptor (CB2R), including positivity, intensity, percentage, site of distribution, and immunohistochemical score, in renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and explore their correlation with various clinicopathological aspects. Methodology We retrospectively obtained data and specimens from 87 patients diagnosed with RCC after partial or radical nephrectomy, and the CB1R and CB2R expression was assessed immunohistochemically on paraffin-embedded tissues. The results were statistically analyzed uni- and multi-factorial along with clinicopathological parameters. Results CB1R was not expressed at all, and CB2R was highly expressed in 78 (89.7%) patients with RCC. In unifactorial analysis, no statistical significance was found in any of the analyzed parameters. However, in the multifactorial analysis, we found that patients with a papillary histologic type (P < 0.0005) were associated with a lower likelihood of expression of the CB2R in the membranous compared with those with clear-cell and were also associated with a higher likelihood of moderate or strong expression of CB2R immunohistochemical score compared with those with clear-cell (P = 0.03). Patients with stage T2 (P = 0.010) had more enhanced expression (grade 3 CB2R intensity) compared with those with stage T1. Males (beta coefficient ± standard error [SE] 13.70 ± 7.04; P = 0.056) and patients with chromophobe histologic type (beta coefficient ± SE 23.45 ± 9.86; P = 0.020) were associated with a higher percentage of CB2R expression. Conclusions Our data suggest that although the CB1R was not expressed in RCCs, CB2R was expressed in almost every patient and enhanced expression was noted in correlation with specific clinicopathological aspects of the patients. Thus, following well-designed studies, especially CB2R could be used as a prognostic marker or even as a potential therapeutic target in RCC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article