Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of altered torsional stiffness through sole modification of air pressure shoes on lower extremity biomechanical behaviour during side-step cutting maneuvers.
Arefin, Md Samsul; Chieh, Hsiao-Feng; Lin, Chien-Ju; Lin, Cheng-Feng; Su, Fong-Chin.
Afiliação
  • Arefin MS; Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Chieh HF; Department of Leather Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.
  • Lin CJ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Lin CF; Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
  • Su FC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
PLoS One ; 19(2): e0297592, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38422014
ABSTRACT
Directional changes in cutting maneuvers are critical in sports, where shoe torsional stiffness (STS) is an important factor. Shoes are designed based on different constructions and movement patterns. Hence, it is unclear how adjustable spacers into the sole constructions of air pressure chambers (APC) affect the STS in side-step cutting. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of altered STS through adjustable sole spacers on ground reaction force (GRF) and ankle and knee joint moments in side-step cutting. Seventeen healthy recreational athletes performed side-step cutting with experimental conditions including (i) barefoot (BF), (ii) unaltered shoes (UAS) soles consisting of APC, and (iii) altered shoes (AS) modified UAS by inserting elastomeric spacers into cavities formed by APC. Mechanical and biomechanical variables were measured. Significant differences were revealed across shoe conditions for impact peak (p = 0.009) and impulse (p = 0.018) in vertical GRF, time to achieve peak braking (p = 0.004), and peak propulsion (p = 0.025) for anterior-posterior GRF in ANOVA test. No significant differences were observed in GRF peaks and impulses between UAS and AS except for a trend of differences in impact peak (p = 0.087) for vertical GRF. At the ankle and knee joint, peak ankle power absorption (p = 0.019), peak knee internal rotation moment (p = 0.042), peak knee extension moment (p = 0.001), peak knee flexion moment (0.000), peak knee power absorption (p = 0.047) showed significant difference across three shoe conditions. However, no significant differences between the UAS and AS were noticed for peak joint moments and power. Altered shoe torsional stiffness did not significantly affect the peak forces and peak ankle and knee joint moments or powers; hence sole adjustment did not influence the cutting performance. This study might be insightful in sports footwear design, and adjusting shoe torsional stiffness by sole modification might be advantageous for athletes playing sports with cutting maneuvers to reduce the risk of injuries by controlling the twisting force at the ankle that frequently happens during cutting maneuvers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sapatos / Extremidade Inferior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sapatos / Extremidade Inferior Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article