Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Posttreatment Imaging in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.
Yadav, Surekha; Lawhn-Heath, Courtney; Paciorek, Alan; Lindsay, Sheila; Mirro, Rebecca; Bergsland, Emily K; Hope, Thomas A.
Afiliação
  • Yadav S; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Lawhn-Heath C; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Paciorek A; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Lindsay S; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Mirro R; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Bergsland EK; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Hope TA; Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
J Nucl Med ; 65(3): 409-415, 2024 Mar 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38428966
ABSTRACT
Posttreatment imaging of γ-emissions after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be used to perform quantitative dosimetry as well as assessment response using qualitative measures. We aimed to assess the impact of qualitative posttreatment imaging on the management of patients undergoing PRRT.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, we evaluated 100 patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, who had posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging at 24 h. First, we evaluated the qualitative assessment of response at each cycle. Then using a chart review, we determined the impact on management from the posttreatment imaging. The changes in management were categorized as major or minor, and the cycles at which these changes occurred were noted. Additionally, tumor grade was also evaluated.

Results:

Of the 100 sequential patients reviewed, most (80% after cycle 2, 79% after cycle 3, and 73% after cycle 4) showed qualitatively stable disease during PRRT. Management changes were observed in 27% (n = 27) of patients; 78% of those (n = 21) were major, and 30% (n = 9) were minor. Most treatment changes occurred after cycle 2 (33% major, 67% minor) and cycle 3 (62% major, 33% minor). Higher tumor grade correlated with increased rate of changes in management (P = 0.006).

Conclusion:

In this retrospective study, qualitative analysis of posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging informed changes in management in 27% of patients. Patients with higher-grade tumors had a higher rate of change in management, and most of the management changes occurred after cycles 2 and 3. Incorporating posttreatment imaging into standard PRRT workflows could potentially enhance patient management.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Octreotida / Tumores Neuroendócrinos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Octreotida / Tumores Neuroendócrinos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article