Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.
Turagam, Mohit K; Neuzil, Petr; Schmidt, Boris; Reichlin, Tobias; Neven, Kars; Metzner, Andreas; Hansen, Jim; Blaauw, Yuri; Maury, Philippe; Arentz, Thomas; Sommer, Philipp; Anic, Ante; Anselme, Frederic; Boveda, Serge; Deneke, Tom; Willems, Stephan; van der Voort, Pepijn; Tilz, Roland; Funasako, Moritoshi; Scherr, Daniel; Wakili, Reza; Steven, Daniel; Kautzner, Josef; Vijgen, Johan; Jais, Pierre; Petru, Jan; Chun, Julian; Roten, Laurent; Füting, Anna; Lemoine, Marc D; Ruwald, Martin; Mulder, Bart A; Rollin, Anne; Lehrmann, Heiko; Fink, Thomas; Jurisic, Zrinka; Chaumont, Corentin; Adelino, Raquel; Nentwich, Karin; Gunawardene, Melanie; Ouss, Alexandre; Heeger, Christian-Hendrik; Manninger, Martin; Bohnen, Jan-Eric; Sultan, Arian; Peichl, Petr; Koopman, Pieter; Derval, Nicolas; Kueffer, Thomas; Reinsch, Nico.
Afiliação
  • Turagam MK; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Neuzil P; Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Schmidt B; MVZ CCB Frankfurt und Main-Taunus GbR, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Reichlin T; Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Neven K; Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.
  • Metzner A; University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Hansen J; Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Blaauw Y; Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Maury P; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France; I2MC, INSERM UMR 1297, Toulouse, France.
  • Arentz T; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Sommer P; Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
  • Anic A; Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia.
  • Anselme F; Department of Cardiology, Rouen Hospital, Rouen, France.
  • Boveda S; Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universitair Ziekenhuis VUB, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Deneke T; Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Rhoen-Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
  • Willems S; Asklepios Hospital St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • van der Voort P; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Tilz R; University Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Funasako M; Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Neuron Medical, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Scherr D; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Wakili R; Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
  • Steven D; Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne, Department for Electrophysiology, Cologne, Germany.
  • Kautzner J; IKEM-Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Vijgen J; Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospitals, Hasselt, Belgium.
  • Jais P; IHU LIRYC, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • Petru J; Cardiology Department, Na Homolce Hospital, Homolka Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Chun J; MVZ CCB Frankfurt und Main-Taunus GbR, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Roten L; Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Füting A; Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.
  • Lemoine MD; University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Ruwald M; Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Mulder BA; Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Rollin A; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
  • Lehrmann H; Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Fink T; Clinic for Electrophysiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
  • Jurisic Z; Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Split, Split, Croatia.
  • Chaumont C; Department of Cardiology, Rouen Hospital, Rouen, France.
  • Adelino R; Heart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France; Universitair Ziekenhuis VUB, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Nentwich K; Heart Center Bad Neustadt, Rhoen-Clinic Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany.
  • Gunawardene M; Asklepios Hospital St Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Ouss A; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Heeger CH; University Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Manninger M; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Bohnen JE; Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
  • Sultan A; Heart Center University Hospital of Cologne, Department for Electrophysiology, Cologne, Germany.
  • Peichl P; IKEM-Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Koopman P; Department of Cardiology, Jessa Hospitals, Hasselt, Belgium.
  • Derval N; IHU LIRYC, CHU Bordeaux, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France.
  • Kueffer T; Inselspital-Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Reinsch N; Department of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital, Essen, Germany.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 10(5): 900-912, 2024 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430087
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA).

METHODS:

In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events.

RESULTS:

Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW 66.4%; 95% CI 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI 73.1%; 95% CI 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW 71.7% vs PVI 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Átrios do Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veias Pulmonares / Fibrilação Atrial / Ablação por Cateter / Átrios do Coração Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article