A comparison between centralized and asynchronous federated learning approaches for survival outcome prediction using clinical and PET data from non-small cell lung cancer patients.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Survival analysis plays an essential role in the medical field for optimal treatment decision-making. Recently, survival analysis based on the deep learning (DL) approach has been proposed and is demonstrating promising results. However, developing an ideal prediction model requires integrating large datasets across multiple institutions, which poses challenges concerning medical data privacy. METHODS: In this paper, we propose FedSurv, an asynchronous federated learning (FL) framework designed to predict survival time using clinical information and positron emission tomography (PET)-based features. This study used two datasets a public radiogenic dataset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the Cancer Imaging Archive (RNSCLC), and an in-house dataset from the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital (CNUHH) in South Korea, consisting of clinical risk factors and F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images in NSCLC patients. Initially, each dataset was divided into multiple clients according to histological attributes, and each client was trained using the proposed DL model to predict individual survival time. The FL framework collected weights and parameters from the clients, which were then incorporated into the global model. Finally, the global model aggregated all weights and parameters and redistributed the updated model weights to each client. We evaluated different frameworks including single-client-based approach, centralized learning and FL. RESULTS: We evaluated our method on two independent datasets. First, on the RNSCLC dataset, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 490.80±22.95 d and the C-Index was 0.69±0.01. Second, on the CNUHH dataset, the MAE was 494.25±40.16 d and the C-Index was 0.71±0.01. The FL approach achieved centralized method performance in PET-based survival time prediction and outperformed single-client-based approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated the feasibility and effectiveness of employing FL for individual survival prediction in NSCLC patients, using clinical information and PET-based features.