Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of the OdonAssist inflatable device for assisted vaginal birth: the BESANCON ASSIST study.
Mottet, Nicolas; Hotton, Emily; Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid; Bourtembourg, Aude; Metz, Jean Patrick; Cot, Sophie; Poitrey, Emilie; Delhomme, Léa; Languerrand, Eric; Nallet, Camille; Lallemant, Marine; Draycott, Tim; Riethmuller, Didier.
Afiliação
  • Mottet N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Nanomedicine Lab, Imagery and Therapeutics, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France. Electronic address: n1mottet@chu-besancon.fr.
  • Hotton E; Women and Children's Research Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom; Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Eckman-Lacroix A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France.
  • Bourtembourg A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France.
  • Metz JP; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France.
  • Cot S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Department of Midwifery Science, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France.
  • Poitrey E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France; Department of Midwifery Science, University of Franche-Comte, Besancon, France.
  • Delhomme L; Pediatric Intensive Care, Neonatology and Pediatric Emergencies Departments, CHU Besancon, Besancon, France, Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Languerrand E; Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Nallet C; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France.
  • Lallemant M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pôle Mère-Femme, University Hospital of Besancon, University of Franche-Comte, Besançon, France.
  • Draycott T; Translational Health Science, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Riethmuller D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Besancon, Grenoble, France.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S947-S958, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462265
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The first feasibility study of the OdonAssist inflatable device for use in clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth reported a success rate of 48% with no significant safety concerns. Additional studies exploring the device performance in other clinical settings are warranted before definitive conclusions can be drawn about its safety and efficacy in current practice.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the OdonAssist before conducting a randomized controlled trial. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was an open-label, nonrandomized study of 104 women with a clinically indicated assisted vaginal birth using the OdonAssist at the Besancon University Hospital, France. Data, including those of a nested cohort group of women who had an assisted vaginal birth using vacuum or spatulas because a trained OdonAssist device operator was not available at the time of delivery, were collected. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist. Neonatal outcome data were reviewed at days 1 and 28, and maternal outcomes were investigated up to day 90.

RESULTS:

Between December 2019 and May 2021, 2191 pregnant women were approached, and 83% (1636/1973) of them consented to participate in the study. Among them, 10.7% (176/1636) required an assisted vaginal birth owing to a vertex presentation at +1 and below. The OdonAssist was used in 59% of births (104/176), and 41.1% (72/176) of the participants were included in the nested cohort group. The rate of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist was 88.5% (92/104). No emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in the OdonAssist group. There were no serious adverse maternal or neonatal reactions related to the use of the device. The rate of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears with the OdonAssist was 3.8% (4/104). The maternal perception ratings of the birth experience with the OdonAssist (collected on days 1, 7, and 28 using a 15-point scale) were high. In addition, the operators reported a positive perception of the device, with ease of use across the different steps of the procedure. One single technique was used for all vertex fetal head positions.

CONCLUSION:

The OdonAssist is a safe and effective alternative to other current devices for assisted vaginal births. The high acceptance rate (83%) among pregnant women and the high rate of successful assisted vaginal births using the OdonAssist confirm the feasibility of a future randomized controlled trial.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Cesárea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Cesárea Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article