Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between social vulnerability index and admission urgency for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Bolakale-Rufai, Ikeoluwapo Kendra; Shinnerl, Alexander; Knapp, Shannon M; Johnson, Amber E; Mohammed, Selma; Brewer, LaPrincess; Torabi, Asad; Addison, Daniel; Mazimba, Sula; Breathett, Khadijah.
Afiliação
  • Bolakale-Rufai IK; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
  • Shinnerl A; School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
  • Knapp SM; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
  • Johnson AE; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
  • Mohammed S; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States of America.
  • Brewer L; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
  • Torabi A; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
  • Addison D; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.
  • Mazimba S; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville and AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, United States of America.
  • Breathett K; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Am Heart J Plus ; 392024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469116
ABSTRACT

Background:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are not offered equitably to vulnerable population groups. Adequate levels of insurance may narrow gaps among patients with higher social vulnerability index (SVI). Among a national population of individuals with commercial or Medicare insurance, we sought to determine whether SVI was associated with urgency of receipt of TAVR for aortic stenosis. Methods and

results:

Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM), we identified admissions for TAVR with aortic stenosis between January 2018 and March 2022. Admission urgency was identified by CDM claims codes. SVI was cross-referenced to patient zip codes and grouped into quintiles. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to predict the probability of a TAVR admission being urgent based on SVI quintiles, adjusting for patient and hospital-level covariates.

Results:

Among 6680 admissions for TAVR [median age 80 years (interquartile range 75-85), 43.9 % female], 8.5 % (n = 567) were classified as urgent. After adjusting for patient and hospital-level variables, there were no significant differences in the odds of urgent admission for TAVR according to SVI quintiles [OR 5th (greatest social vulnerability) vs 1st quintile (least social vulnerability) 1.29 (95 % CI 0.90-1.85)].

Conclusions:

Among commercial or Medicare beneficiaries with aortic stenosis, SVI was not associated with admission urgency for TAVR. To clarify whether cardiovascular care delivery is improved across SVI with higher paying beneficiaries, future investigation should identify whether relationships between SVI and TAVR urgency vary for Medicaid beneficiaries compared to commercial beneficiaries.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article