Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation.
Matysiak, Witold P; Landeweerd, Marieke C; Bannink, Agata; van der Weide, Hiska L; Brouwer, Charlotte L; Langendijk, Johannes A; Both, Stefan; Maduro, John H.
Afiliação
  • Matysiak WP; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Landeweerd MC; Department of Radiotherapy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
  • Bannink A; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van der Weide HL; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Brouwer CL; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Langendijk JA; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Both S; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Maduro JH; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(5)2024 Feb 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38473254
ABSTRACT
Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article