Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic insights into infection risk over time in two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.
Ha, Jeong Hyun; Ahn, Seoin; Kim, Hong-Kyu; Lee, Han-Byoel; Moon, Hyeong-Gon; Han, Wonshik; Hong, Ki Yong; Chang, Hak; Lee, Gordon K; Choi, Jinwook; Jin, Ung Sik.
Afiliação
  • Ha JH; Interdisciplinary Program of Medical Informatics, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
  • Ahn S; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Kim HK; Interdisciplinary Program of Bioengineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University.
  • Lee HB; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Moon HG; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Han W; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University.
  • Hong KY; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Chang H; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Lee GK; Genomic Medicine Institute, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University.
  • Choi J; Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital.
  • Jin US; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University.
Int J Surg ; 110(6): 3433-3439, 2024 Jun 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38489664
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Infections following postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) can compromise surgical outcomes and lead to significant morbidity. This study aimed to discern the timing of infections in two-stage IBR and associated risk factors.

METHOD:

A review of electronic health records was conducted on 1096 breasts in 1058 patients undergoing two-stage IBR at Seoul National University Hospital (2015-2020). Infections following the first-stage tissue expander (TE) insertion and second-stage TE exchange were analyzed separately, considering associated risk factors.

RESULTS:

Over a median follow-up of 53.5 months, infections occurred in 2.9% (32/1096) after the first stage and 4.1% (44/1070) after the second stage. Infections following the first-stage procedure exhibited a bimodal distribution across time, while those after the second-stage procedure showed a unimodal pattern. When analyzing risk factors for infection after the first-stage procedure, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was associated with early (≤7 weeks) infection, while both ALND and obesity were independent predictors of late (>7 weeks) infection. For infections following the second-stage procedure, obesity, postmastectomy radiotherapy, a history of expander infection, ALND, and the use of textured implants were identified as independent risk factors. Postmastectomy radiotherapy was related to non-salvaged outcomes after infection following both stages.

CONCLUSION:

Infections following first and second-stage IBR exhibit distinct timelines reflecting different pathophysiology. Understanding these timelines and associated risk factors will inform patient selection for IBR and aid in tailored postoperative surveillance planning. These findings contribute to refining patient suitability for IBR and optimizing personalized postoperative care strategies.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes de Mama / Mastectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes de Mama / Mastectomia Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article