Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Performance of thoracic ultrasonography compared with chest radiography for the detection of rib fractures using computed tomography as a reference standard.
Vassalou, Evangelia E; Perysinakis, Iraklis; Klontzas, Michail E; de Bree, Eelco; Karantanas, Apostolos H.
Afiliação
  • Vassalou EE; Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Voutes, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece. vassalou.e@hotmail.com.
  • Perysinakis I; Department of Medical Imaging, General Hospital of Sitia, Xserokamares, 72300, Sitia, Crete, Greece. vassalou.e@hotmail.com.
  • Klontzas ME; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Voutes, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • de Bree E; Department of Medical Imaging, University Hospital of Heraklion, Voutes, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
  • Karantanas AH; Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Voutes, 71110, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Skeletal Radiol ; 2024 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38499892
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Although there is growing evidence that ultrasonography is superior to X-ray for rib fractures' detection, X-ray is still indicated as the most appropriate method. This has partially been attributed to a lack of studies using an appropriate reference modality. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and X-ray in the detection of rib fractures, considering CT as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Within a 2.5-year period, all consecutive patients with clinically suspected rib fracture(s) following blunt chest trauma and available posteroanterior/anteroposterior X-ray and thoracic CT were prospectively studied and planned to undergo thoracic ultrasonography, by a single operator. All imaging examinations were evaluated for cortical rib fracture(s), and their location was recorded. The cartilaginous rib portions were not assessed. CTs and X-rays were evaluated retrospectively. Concomitant thoracic/extra-thoracic injuries were assessed on CT. Comparisons were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS:

Fifty-nine patients (32 males, 27 females; mean age, 53.1 ± 16.6 years) were included. CT, ultrasonography, and X-ray (40 posteroanterior/19 anteroposterior views) diagnosed 136/122/42 rib fractures in 56/54/27 patients, respectively. Ultrasonography and X-ray had sensitivity of 100%/40% and specificity of 89.7%/30.9% for rib fractures' detection. Ultrasound accuracy was 94.9% compared to 35.4% for X-rays (P < .001) in detecting individual rib fractures. Most fractures involved the 4th-9th ribs. Upper rib fractures were most commonly overlooked on ultrasonography. Thoracic cage/spine fractures and haemothorax represented the most common concomitant injuries.

CONCLUSION:

Ultrasonography appeared to be superior to X-ray for the detection of rib fractures with regard to a reference CT.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article