Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Anesthesia Start Time Documentation Through a Departmental Education Initiative at Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, United States.
Warren, Michael H; Mehta, Sumarth; Glowka, Lena; Goncalves, Octavio; Gutman, Elena; Schonberger, Robert B.
Afiliação
  • Warren MH; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • Mehta S; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
  • Glowka L; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
  • Goncalves O; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
  • Gutman E; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
  • Schonberger RB; Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Cureus ; 16(2): e54351, 2024 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38500895
ABSTRACT
Background Reimbursement for anesthetic services in the United States utilizes a formula that incorporates procedural and patient factors with total anesthesia time. According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the period of billable time starts when the anesthesia practitioner assumes care of the patient and may include transport to the operating room from the preoperative holding area. In this report on a quality improvement effort, we implemented a departmental education initiative aimed at improving the accuracy of anesthesia start-time documentation. Methods Utilizing de-identified, internal data on surgical procedures at Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH), New Haven, United States, the difference between documented anesthesia start and patient in-room time was determined for all cases. Those with a difference between 0-1 minute were assumed "likely underbilled," and the total revenue lost for these cases was estimated using a weighted average of institutional reimbursement per unit of time. A monthly, department-wide educational email was then introduced to inform practitioners about the guidelines around start-time documentation, and the percentage of "likely underbilled" cases and lost revenue estimates trended over a one-year period. Results Baseline data in December 2020 showed that of the 6,877 total surgical cases requiring anesthesia at YNHH, 55.1% (N=3,790) had an anesthesia start to in-room time of 0-1 minute, which were considered "likely underbilled." The average start-to-in-room time for properly recorded cases (44.9%, N=3,087) was 4.42 minutes. The baseline revenue lost in December 2020 for underbilled cases was estimated at $52,302. Over the one-year quality improvement initiative, the proportion of underbilled cases showed a downward trend, decreasing to 29.2% of total cases by November 2021. The estimate of revenue lost due to underbilling also showed a downward trend, decreasing to $29,300 in November 2021. Conclusion This quality improvement study demonstrated that a relatively simple, department-wide educational email sent monthly correlated with an improvement in anesthesia start-time documentation accuracy and a reduction in estimated revenue lost to underbilling over a one-year period.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article