Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Muscle and joint mechanics during maximum force biting following total temporomandibular joint replacement surgery.
Woodford, Sarah C; Robinson, Dale L; Abduo, Jaafar; Lee, Peter V S; Ackland, David C.
Afiliação
  • Woodford SC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia. s.woodford@unimelb.edu.au.
  • Robinson DL; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
  • Abduo J; Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
  • Lee PVS; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
  • Ackland DC; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol ; 23(3): 809-823, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502434
ABSTRACT
Total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) surgery is the established treatment for severe temporomandibular joint disorders. While TMJR surgery is known to increase mouth-opening capacity, reduce pain and improve quality of life, little is known about post-surgical jaw function during activities of daily living such as biting and chewing. The aim of this study was to use subject-specific 3D bite force measurements to evaluate the magnitude and direction of joint loading in unilateral total TMJR patients and compare these data to those in healthy control subjects. An optoelectronic tracking system was used to measure jaw kinematics while biting a rubber sample for 5 unilateral total TMJR patients and 8 controls. Finite element simulations driven by the measured kinematics were employed to calculate the resultant bite force generated when compressing the rubber between teeth during biting tasks. Subject-specific musculoskeletal models were subsequently used to calculate muscle and TMJ loading. Unilateral total TMJR patients generated a bite force of 249.6 ± 24.4 N and 164.2 ± 62.3 N when biting on the contralateral and ipsilateral molars, respectively. In contrast, controls generated a bite force of 317.1 ± 206.6 N. Unilateral total TMJR patients biting on the contralateral molars had a significantly higher lateral TMJ force direction (median difference 63.6°, p = 0.028) and a significantly lower ratio of working TMJ force to bite force (median difference 0.17, p = 0.049) than controls. Results of this study may guide TMJ prosthesis design and evaluation of dental implants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação Temporomandibular / Força de Mordida / Análise de Elementos Finitos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Articulação Temporomandibular / Força de Mordida / Análise de Elementos Finitos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article