Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blind deconvolution decreases requirements on temporal resolution of DCE-MRI: Application to 2nd generation pharmacokinetic modeling.
Kratochvíla, Jirí; Jirík, Radovan; Bartos, Michal; Standara, Michal; Starcuk, Zenon; Taxt, Torfinn.
Afiliação
  • Kratochvíla J; Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kratochvila@isibrno.cz.
  • Jirík R; Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Bartos M; Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information Technology and Automation, Pod Vodárenskou vezí 4, 182 08 Praha 8, Czech Republic.
  • Standara M; Department of Radiology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zlutý kopec 7, 656 53 Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Starcuk Z; Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Taxt T; Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, Bergen, Norway.
Magn Reson Imaging ; 109: 238-248, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38508292
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MRI with 2nd generation pharmacokinetic models provides estimates of plasma flow and permeability surface-area product in contrast to the broadly used 1st generation models (e.g. the Tofts models). However, the use of 2nd generation models requires higher frequency with which the dynamic images are acquired (around 1.5 s per image). Blind deconvolution can decrease the demands on temporal resolution as shown previously for one of the 1st generation models. Here, the temporal-resolution requirements achievable for blind deconvolution with a 2nd generation model are studied.

METHODS:

The 2nd generation model is formulated as the distributed-capillary adiabatic-tissue-homogeneity (DCATH) model. Blind deconvolution is based on Parker's model of the arterial input function. The accuracy and precision of the estimated arterial input functions and the perfusion parameters is evaluated on synthetic and real clinical datasets with different levels of the temporal resolution.

RESULTS:

The estimated arterial input functions remained unchanged from their reference high-temporal-resolution estimates (obtained with the sampling interval around 1 s) when increasing the sampling interval up to about 5 s for synthetic data and up to 3.6-4.8 s for real data. Further increasing of the sampling intervals led to systematic distortions, such as lowering and broadening of the 1st pass peak. The resulting perfusion-parameter estimation error was below 10% for the sampling intervals up to 3 s (synthetic data), in line with the real data perfusion-parameter boxplots which remained unchanged up to the sampling interval 3.6 s.

CONCLUSION:

We show that use of blind deconvolution decreases the demands on temporal resolution in DCE-MRI from about 1.5 s (in case of measured arterial input functions) to 3-4 s. This can be exploited in increased spatial resolution or larger organ coverage.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article