Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perceptions of the effectiveness of using patient encounter data as an education and reflection tool in general practice training.
Klein, Linda; Bentley, Michael; Moad, Dominica; Fielding, Alison; Tapley, Amanda; van Driel, Mieke; Davey, Andrew; Mundy, Ben; FitzGerald, Kristen; Taylor, Jennifer; Norris, Racheal; Holliday, Elizabeth; Magin, Parker.
Afiliação
  • Klein L; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Bentley M; General Practice Training Tasmania, Level 3, RACT House, 179 Murray Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
  • Moad D; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Fielding A; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Tapley A; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • van Driel M; General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia.
  • Davey A; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Mundy B; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • FitzGerald K; General Practice Training Tasmania, Level 3, RACT House, 179 Murray Street, Hobart, Tas. 7000, Australia.
  • Taylor J; GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Norris R; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
  • Holliday E; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
  • Magin P; School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and GP Synergy, NSW and ACT Research and Evaluation Unit, Level 1, 20 McIntosh Drive, Mayfield West, NSW 2304, Australia.
J Prim Health Care ; 16(1): 12-20, 2024 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546767
ABSTRACT
Introduction Patient encounter tools provide feedback and potentially reflection on general practitioner (GP) registrars' in-practice learning and may contribute to the formative assessment of clinical competencies. However, little is known about the perceived utility of such tools. Aim To investigate the perceived utility of a patient encounter tool by GP registrars, their supervisors, and medical educators (MEs). Methods General practice registrars, supervisors and MEs from two Australian regional training organisations completed a cross-sectional questionnaire. Registrars rated how Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), a patient encounter tool, influenced their reflection on, and change in, clinical practice, learning and training. Supervisors' and MEs' perceptions provided contextual information about understanding their registrars' clinical practice, learning and training needs. Results Questionnaires were completed by 48% of registrars (n = 90), 22% of supervisors (n = 182), and 61% of MEs (n = 62). Most registrars agreed that ReCEnT helped them reflect on their clinical practice (79%), learning needs (69%) and training needs (72%). Many registrars reported changing their clinical practice (54%) and learning approaches (51%). Fewer (37%) agreed that ReCEnT influenced them to change their training plans. Most supervisors (68%) and MEs (82%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars' clinical practice. Similarly, most supervisors (63%) and MEs (68%) agreed ReCEnT reports helped them better understand their registrars' learning and training needs. Discussion ReCEnT can prompt self-reflection among registrars, leading to changes in clinical practice, learning approaches and training plans. Reaching its potential as an assessment for learning (as opposed to an assessment of learning) requires effective engagement between registrars, their supervisors and MEs.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Geral / Clínicos Gerais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina Geral / Clínicos Gerais Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article