Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Four-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial of Topical Pain Control for Sentinel Node Radiotracer Injections in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Wiener, Alyssa A; Schumacher, Jessica R; Perlman, Scott B; Wilke, Lee G; Lautner, Meeghan A; Bozzuto, Laura M; Hanlon, Bret M; Neuman, Heather B.
Afiliação
  • Wiener AA; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Schumacher JR; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Perlman SB; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Wilke LG; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Lautner MA; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Bozzuto LM; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Hanlon BM; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Neuman HB; Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA. neuman@surgery.wisc.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(7): 4487-4497, 2024 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557909
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Radioactive tracer injections for breast cancer sentinel lymph node mapping can be painful. In this randomized trial, we compared four approaches to topical pain control for radiotracer injections.

METHODS:

Breast cancer patients were randomized (9 April 2021-8 May 2022) to receive the institutional standard of ice prior to injection (n = 44), or one of three treatments ice plus a vibrating distraction device (Buzzy®; n = 39), 4% lidocaine patch (n = 44), or 4% lidocaine patch plus ice plus Buzzy® (n = 40). Patients completed the Wong-Baker FACES® pain score (primary outcome) and a satisfaction with pain control received scale (secondary). Nuclear medicine technologists (n = 8) rated perceived pain control and ease of administration for each patient. At study conclusion, technologists rank-ordered treatments. Data were analyzed as intention-to-treat. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare pain scores of control versus pooled treatment arms (primary) and then control to each treatment arm individually (secondary).

RESULTS:

There were no differences in pain scores between the control and treatment groups, both pooled and individually. Eighty-five percent of patients were 'satisfied/very satisfied' with treatment received, with no differences between groups. No differences in providers' perceptions of pain were observed, although providers perceived treatments involving Buzzy© more difficult to administer (p < 0.001). Providers rated lidocaine patch as the easiest, with ice being second.

CONCLUSION:

In this randomized trial, no differences in patient-reported pain or satisfaction with treatment was observed between ice and other topical treatments. Providers found treatments using Buzzy® more difficult to administer. Given patient satisfaction and ease of administration, ice is a reasonable standard.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Manejo da Dor / Anestésicos Locais / Lidocaína Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Manejo da Dor / Anestésicos Locais / Lidocaína Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article