Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of methods proposed for monitoring cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in the water environment.
Calarco, Jeanette; Pruden, Amy; Harwood, Valerie J.
Afiliação
  • Calarco J; Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • Pruden A; Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
  • Harwood VJ; Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 90(5): e0212823, 2024 05 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38572968
ABSTRACT
Escherichia coli is a promising subject for globally coordinated surveillance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in water environments due to its clinical relevance and widespread use as an indicator of fecal contamination. Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli was recently evaluated favorably for this purpose by the World Health Organization TriCycle Protocol, which specifies tryptone bile x-glucuronide (TBX) medium and incubation at 35°C. We assessed comparability with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-approved method for E. coli quantification, which uses membrane-thermotolerant E. coli (mTEC) agar and incubation at 44.5°C, in terms of recovery of E. coli and cefotaxime-resistant E. coli from wastewater influent and surface waters. Total E. coli concentrations in wastewater influent were 106-108 CFU/100 mL, while cefotaxime-resistant E. coli were ~100-fold lower. Total E. coli in surface waters were ~102 CFU/100 mL, and cefotaxime-resistant isolates were near the limit of detection (0.4 CFU/100 mL). Total and putative cefotaxime-resistant E. coli concentrations did not differ significantly between media or by incubation method; however, colonies isolated on mTEC were more frequently confirmed to species (97.1%) compared to those from TBX (92.5%). Incubation in a water bath at 44.5°C significantly decreased non-specific background growth and improved confirmation frequency on both media (97.4%) compared to incubation at 35°C (92.3%). This study helps to advance globally coordinated AMR in water environments and suggests that the TriCycle Protocol is adaptable to other standard methods that may be required in different locales, while also offering a means to improve specificity by decreasing the frequency of false-positive identification of cefotaxime-resistant E. coli by modifying incubation conditions.IMPORTANCEAs antibiotic-resistant bacteria in water environments are increasingly recognized as contributors to the global antibiotic resistance crisis, the need for a monitoring subject that captures antibiotic resistance trends on a global scale increases. The World Health Organization TriCycle Protocol proposes the use of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli isolated on tryptone bile x-glucuronide agar. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) criteria for safe recreational waters also use E. coli as an indicator but specify the use of mTEC agar at a higher incubation temperature (44.5°C vs 35°C). We assessed the comparability of these methods for isolating total and cefotaxime-resistant E. coli, finding overall good agreement and performance, but significantly higher specificity toward E. coli selection with the use of the USEPA incubation protocol and mTEC agar. This study is the first to directly compare these methods and provides evidence that the methods may be used interchangeably for global surveillance of antibiotic resistance in the environment.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefotaxima / Escherichia coli / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cefotaxima / Escherichia coli / Antibacterianos Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article