Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pilot Lifestyle Intervention Effect on Lifestyle Behaviors, Psychosocial Factors, and Affect.
Chang, Mei-Wei; Wegener, Duane T; Tan, Alai; Schaffir, Jonathan; Worly, Brett; Strafford, Katherine; Soma, Loriana; Sampsell, Cassandra.
Afiliação
  • Chang MW; The Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1577 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Wegener DT; The Ohio State University, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 395 West 12th Avenue, 5th floor Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Tan A; The Ohio State University College of Nursing, 1577 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Schaffir J; The Ohio State University Department of Psychology, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Worly B; The Ohio State University Department of Psychology, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Strafford K; The Ohio State University Department of Psychology, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Soma L; The Ohio State University Department of Psychology, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
  • Sampsell C; The Ohio State University Department of Psychology, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38576861
ABSTRACT

Background:

This paper presents results of a pilot intervention effect on lifestyle behaviors, psychosocial factors, and affect among overweight or obese pregnant women.

Methods:

70 participants were randomized to the intervention or usual care group. During the 20-week intervention, participants completed a weekly online intervention module and joined individual online health coaching. Data were collected at baseline (<17 weeks gestation), 24-27 weeks gestation (T2), and 35-37 weeks gestation (T3). Lifestyle behaviors included dietary intake (caloric, fat, added sugar, fruit, and vegetable) and physical activity (PA). Psychosocial factors were autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, executive functions, and consideration of future consequences (CFC). Affect comprised stress and emotional control. Two-sample t-tests and Cohen's d effect sizes were used to compare between group mean differences in the change from baseline to T2 and T3.

Results:

At T2, intervention positively influenced fruit intake (d = 0.47), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.36), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.25) and PA (d = 0.24), executive functions (behavior regulation, d = -0.21; metacognition, d = -0.69), and emotional control (d = 0.79). At T3, the intervention improved PA (d = 0.19), autonomous motivation for healthy eating (d = 0.33), self-efficacy for healthy eating (d = 0.50) and stress management (d = 0.62), executive functions (metacognition, d = -0.46), CFC (d = 0.25), stress (d = -0.45), and emotional control (d = 0.72).

Conclusion:

The pilot intervention has positive effects on most psychosocial variables and affect in both the short and long terms.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article