Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Navigating complexity: The Supera's triumph in femoropopliteal lesions.
Loureiro, Luis; Pinelo, Andreia; Veterano, Carlos; Rocha, Henrique; Castro, João; Machado, Rui.
Afiliação
  • Loureiro L; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Pinelo A; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Veterano C; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Rocha H; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Castro J; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
  • Machado R; Angiology and Vascular Surgery Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal.
Vascular ; : 17085381241246321, 2024 Apr 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588331
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The femoropopliteal sector endovascular treatment is particularly challenging due to its high tortuosity and torsional forces. Better results are still needed to ensure the long-term patency of stenting in this area. The Supera stent appears to change this paradigm.

METHODS:

This single-center retrospective cohort study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of femoropopliteal stenting with Supera in a real-world population. Seventy-nine patients were treated between January 2015 and December 2020, and the results are reported with a median follow-up of 28 months.

RESULTS:

Indications for revascularization were chronic limb-threatening ischemia with tissue loss (73.6%) or ischemic rest pain (17.7%) and claudication (7.6%). Thirty-six patients (45.6%) were classified as GLASS stage III according to the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System, with 65.8% and 30.4% in grades 3 and 4 of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal sectors, respectively. The 36-month primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 68.6%, 72.0%, and 79.0%, respectively, with an amputation-free survival rate of 86.6%. There was no significant difference between primary patency rates in GLASS stages I-II compared with GLASS stage III (36-month primary patency rates of 72% vs 63% respectively, p = 0.342) nor in amputation-free survival (88% vs 84%, p = 0.877). After adjusting for potential confounders, only the stent conformation significantly affected the primary patency rates, with a higher hazard of reintervention for the elongated (HR = 3.179; p = 0.36; CI 1.081-9.347) and the compressed (HR = 3.014; p = 0.42; CI 1.039-8.746) forms.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 36-month patency of the Supera stents in our real-world cohort was similar to other reported series. The GLASS stage did not interfere with the stent patency, proving it is a good choice even in the most adverse anatomy patients. Only the non-nominal stent conformation affected the primary patency rates in our patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article